Tag: renewables

Going Domestic: Why Builders Want American-Made PV Wire

Posted on by bop-admin

If you’ve been paying attention, you’ve likely seen one news story after another hyping up the U.S. solar industry. 

We’ve seen years of growth as clean energies like wind and solar take over new generating capacity. In 2024, for example, solar comprised two-thirds (66%) of U.S. electricity-generating capacity additions. Overall, the solar industry installed about 50 GWdc of capacity last year, hitting a new one-year record. 

Tailwinds and Headaches 

So, what’s driving companies, utilities, and communities to dive into solar energy? As it turns out, several factors combined to get us here. 

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has had a couple of years to come into form. Incentives made through the program extended and broadened solar tax credits, making large-scale solar projects a better investment. 

The IRA also created measures to develop sustainable domestic supply chains for solar panels, racking, and wire. Previously, solar companies imported foreign solar components, dealing with everything from long delays to questionable quality. The costs were lower, but the industry struggled. 

Today, domestic manufacturing is taking a monumental step forward. Recently, the SEIA announced the U.S. had reached a critical manufacturing milestone. Domestic solar module production capacity hit 50 GW, large enough to meet current U.S. demand. Backed by Section 45X and Section 48C tax credits, incentives bolster an already booming industry. 

Despite some potential governmental headwinds, industry experts are bullish on solar energy’s future. 

Does Buying Domestic Matter? 

The U.S. is encouraging developers to use American-made goods, including PV wire. But does domestically produced wire warrant the higher cost? 

In many cases, the short answer to that question is yes. Although all PV wires may look similar, subtle details impact quality, lifespan, and performance. We must also consider project scopes, including timelines, budgets, locations, and job requirements. 

Depending on the situation, American-made PV wire could be a cost-saver. 

Quality and Build 

Solar wire made in the United States meets or exceeds Underwriter Laboratories, National Electrical Code (NEC), and ASTM standards, including: 

UL 4703 – This UL standard is specific to PV wire. UL 4703 tests a wire’s ability to handle sunlight exposure, high temperatures, weather, and other threats. 

UL 1581 – Also known as the VW-1 test, UL 1581 is a vertical flammability test. Essentially, UL 1581 determines how much a flame propagates (spreads) along a wire section. 

ASTM B-1, B-3, B-8, and B-33 – These wire configuration standards correspond to specific wire types. In order, they are hard-drawn copper (B-1), soft-drawn copper (B-3), concentric lay twisted strands (B-8), and tinned copper (B-33). 

American-made PV wire undergoes heavy scrutiny, resulting in high transparency. Additionally, strict standards add a layer of safety to every product, ensuring the wire does what it should. This may not be the case with products shipped from overseas, as other countries’ standards may be less stringent. 

NEC Section 691 – This portion of the NEC corresponds to several aspects of utility-scale solar sites with generating capacity over 5 MW. It covers factors like operating voltages, disconnects, fire mitigation, engineering, and other critical safety measures. 

Supply Chains and Lead Times 

Timelines matter – whether it’s a utility-scale solar array or a small community solar project. 

One massive advantage American-made products have is their shorter supply chains. Because the manufacturing and shipping are both within the U.S., production lead times tend to be much shorter. Shipping times are also shorter because products don’t have to travel by boat to the United States. 

On top of the shorter shipping and lead times, buying from domestic manufacturers helps developers avoid tariffs and duties. Importers often pay tariffs on materials from other countries, adding costs to the products they buy. Duties, on the other hand, are taxes paid on imported goods. 

Domestic production is also handy if problems arise. When customers find defects in their solar wire, they can return it to the manufacturer easily. Because the route is much shorter, the amount of time it takes to switch the wire is faster. Cutting a weeks-long wait down to only a few days is crucial when developers are racing to meet looming deadlines. 

Weighing Costs with Lead Times 

If deadlines aren’t an issue and the company has time to wait, sometimes shipping products from overseas could be an option. 

Buyers take on risks with the purchase, including the threat of geopolitical issues coming into play and tariffs. However, despite longer customer lead times and riskier supply chains, developers could save money on large-scale projects by using imported wire. 

Budgetary Constraints 

Developers endlessly search for ways to deliver the best results with the most savings possible. 

To that end, U.S. materials offer solid production, quality, and price. American-made materials follow a strict production process to ensure higher durability, longer lifespans, and better manufacturing traceability. The result is a product that often lives up to the price point. 

But every dollar counts, especially when you’re dealing with solar systems with hundreds of aisles of panels. Wire is a pretty small piece of the overall budgetary pie, but as projects grow larger, so does the cost of wire. 

Project Requirements 

Sometimes, it isn’t about price, performance, or any other factor – the project just requires domestic PV wire. 

Over the years, solar projects have become more specific, especially as the federal government attempts to bolster domestic manufacturing. As a result, more solar projects are pushing to meet domestic content requirements like BABA. The products called for are then “spec’d in,” requiring developers to source those materials for the project. 

BABA, or the “Build America, Buy America” program, ties funding and tax credits to solar projects. For example, ITCs and PTCs contain language about using American-made materials in the site’s development. We wrote a blog about these rules, which you can find here. 

State and local domestic product incentives could also be in play, depending on the project’s location. 

The Case for Imported Wire 

So, with so much focus on domestic production, is there a place for imported PV wire? 

Imported wire can do the job, but it’s important to ALWAYS work with a trusted, vetted international partner. Different countries have different standards, so it’s on the developer to verify who they buy from is reputable. 

Price – Larger projects call for more wire – often to the tune of hundreds of thousands of feet. Imported wire is generally more cost-effective, reducing overall project costs. 

Access to In-Stock or Unique Products – On occasion, solar projects may call for uncommon wire, which could lead to longer lead times. Overseas vendors may have specialized products in stock, keeping projects moving on time. 

Once again, DO YOUR RESEARCH before purchasing thousands of feet of wire from an international vendor. A trusted partner can meet safety standards and be transparent about their processes, ensuring high quality. 

Small Line Item, Huge Impact 

Wire is a crucial component of any utility- or community-scale solar installation. Without it, electricity doesn’t move from the panels to the electrical grid. 

Buying American isn’t solely about supporting the Red, White, and Blue. Builders get faster shipping, fewer added shipping costs, top-quality products, and peace of mind. 

Some overseas products may have similar quality, but EPCs must do their due diligence. This means building trust and verifying those manufacturers produce high-quality products. 

At the end of the day, not all wire is the same. No matter where the wire comes from, only work with trustworthy manufacturers that meet the highest standards. The result will be better installations, safer projects, and long-lasting performance for decades. 

Dirty Jobs: Do Dust and Grime Lower Solar Panel Performance?

Posted on by bop-admin

How often do you look around your house and realize everything is a dusty mess. 

You clean, wipe, and feather dust everything, but keeping everything tidy is a never-ending battle. 

Well, take solace that you’re not alone. Solar farms around the world deal with the same problem with varying results. 

Efficiency Killers 

The average solar panel has an efficiency rate above 20%, though some prototypes can perform better. 

But no matter how efficient your panels are, dirt, grime, and other schmutz are a constant threat. It might not seem like it at first glance, but solar panels are constantly picking up debris called soiling. If not taken care of, those particles can cause headaches for utilities, communities, and companies. 

Luckily, soiling doesn’t have to be an energy-generation killer. With some planning, proactive work, and emerging panel cleaning technology, it’s possible to easily maintain efficiency. 

What Causes Dirty Solar Panels? 

As with anything left outside, dust, dirt, pollen, and debris collect on panels over time. 

When dirt, dust, and other particles fall onto solar panels, they obscure the cells, leading to lower efficiency. Unfortunately, this is a common problem for many solar installations, especially those in sunny, desert areas. 

Dirty panels may not seem concerning, but even a little dust and debris can hurt production. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, soiling accounts for as much as 7% of annual energy lost in the United States. Unfortunately, in even dustier areas like the Middle East, losses can be as much as half. 

Although lost energy is an issue, let’s face it: money can be an even larger motivator. MIT experts suggest even a 1% reduction in power from a 150 MW solar project could cause $200,000 in lost revenue annually. As panels take on more soiling, losses can quickly mount, resulting in lower ROIs. 

Of course, soiling does more than impair solar power generation – it can be a headache. In many cases, a good rainstorm can wash away most dust, dirt, and other messes, but that’s if there’s regular rain. In areas where rain is rare, moisture can combine with dirt and grime to create a much harder-to-remove filth. 

Sometimes, it may make sense for workers to use a water jet to clean solar panels. This process uses pure water to wash away soiling – any impurities can leave water spots and deposits. Another option for solar sites is dry brushing. Brushing is generally less effective than water and may potentially scratch or damage panels. 

Not all Soiling is Dirt 

It might not cause the same issues as a thick layer of dust on a solar panel, but snow poses its own production risks. 

When snow lands on solar panels, it’s harder for sunlight to reach cells, limiting power generation. Beyond reducing power output, heavy snow can damage panels, racking systems, and sensitive tracking components. Workers must then replace expensive equipment, leading to further lost revenue. 

Unlike dirt and grime, snow is easier to deal with on a solar site. Workers can quickly remove snow with a soft bristle or foam brush, leaf blower, de-icing product, or heating system. Panels could also naturally clear themselves as snow and ice slide off the tilted panels. 

Melting snow and ice offers another benefit for solar sites, as the water may remove soiling. 

Powering Down: How Soiling Impacts Production 

When dust, bird droppings, dirt, snow, and other debris block solar panels, it can start a chain reaction impacting short- and long-term activity. 

But what types of problems can we expect, and when can we expect them? The answer isn’t always clear, but it depends on location, water resources, and cost. 

Reduced Power Generation 

We’ve covered this a little bit already, but when dust builds up on solar cells, it prevents them from collecting solar energy. 

Needless to say, a solar panel not collecting solar energy is a problem. Over time, more dust and grime build up on the panels, causing drastic production decreases. Even worse, soiling can cement onto the panels as dirt combines with resting liquids like dew or condensation. 

Soiling does more than impact initial energy output. Less generated power means less revenue, which hurts the bottom line and the project’s lifetime return on investment (ROI). 

Higher Maintenance Costs 

Dirty panels are more than a productivity killer – they can run up maintenance costs, too. 

If rain and melting snow can’t clean the panels naturally, crews might have to drive to the site and clean them. Unfortunately, cleaning solar panels isn’t as easy as hooking up a garden hose and getting to work.

NOTE: Never allow crews to clean panels using a pressure washer. High-pressure water can damage sensitive solar cells and panel seals, even from several feet away.

Utility-scale solar systems can cover hundreds of acres, requiring the services of a professional cleaning company. Depending on how they choose to clean, the company might need to bring in pure water – regular water can leave deposits on the panels. Cleaning crews also need specific cleaning tools to prevent scratches and other damage that could impact energy production. 

Another option could be to invest in a self-cleaning system. Although these systems increase upfront costs, they maximize efficiency over the installation’s lifespan. 

Shorter Panel Lifespans 

How often do we hear about the importance of changing our car’s oil to avoid catastrophic engine issues? 

The same “ounce of prevention” advice our uncles gave us years ago holds the same value when applied to solar systems. When soiling goes untreated, it puts the solar energy system at risk. 

Without regular cleaning, dirt and debris raises the operating temperature of the solar panel system, resulting in damage. If damage occurs, crews may need to repair or replace panels to regain lost efficiency. 

Worse yet, muck and grime could damage other parts and pieces in the solar system, including tracking components. These sensitive components are complex – anything preventing their movement will immediately impact performance and eventually cause them to break. 

Preventing Damage 

Despite the potential problems associated with soiling, keeping up with cleaning is sometimes surprisingly simple. 

Whether allowing nature to lend a hand or investing in top-notch tech, keeping panels clean isn’t always a battle. 

Let the Rain Help 

Sometimes, the easiest way to handle a dirty solar panel is to let nature take its course. 

Rain, wind, and snow do a good job of keeping solar panels clean, especially between scheduled cleanings. Depending on the panel’s angle and the environment, rain and snow might be enough to wash away dust, dirt, and other debris. However, flat panels may have difficulty self-cleaning because they lack tilt. 

In rainy or snowy regions, the weather can be an excellent way to maintain panel efficiency with little effort. During dry spells, dust and grime build up on the panels, but one or two rainstorms can quickly improve efficiency to near its maximum. 

Keep an Eye on Systems 

Problems are much easier to address early on than when left to grow. 

Monitoring systems attached to solar systems can detect power generation decreases using sensors, output metrics, or other tracking. Larger sites mean more sensors, especially on farms where conditions vary from one area to the next. 

Constant monitoring allows crews to investigate problems quickly and determine if they need to take action. 

Maintain a Regular Schedule 

Proper maintenance helps get the most out of every component throughout its lifespan. 

Just like changing a car’s oil regularly, set up a cleaning schedule for the solar site and follow it. Crews can clean panels in several ways but most commonly use water or soft brushes. 

Using pure water is the safest method for cleaning solar panels, but costly if it needs to be delivered by truck. Soft brushes or blower systems are a cheaper option but tend to be less effective. They also may risk scratching or damaging the thin film solar panels if done improperly. 

Beyond simple cleaning methods available today are developing technologies capable of cleaning solar panel surfaces without touching them. One solution uses electrostatic repulsion to magnetically remove dust from the panel’s surface, safely cleaning it without water. 

Join the Robot Revolution 

As our lives become more autonomous, robots and algorithms have taken on more of our daily work. 

Autonomous cleaning systems mounted onto the solar system can wipe dust from panels without humans. The process is successful in the Middle East, where sand and dust constantly threaten energy production. 

Solar companies have no shortage of automated cleaning systems, with dozens on the market today. Many operate on solar power, cleaning rows of panels without water. 

Keeping Up with a Constant Problem 

We can’t realistically protect solar panels from every bit of dust and debris. Luckily, we have plenty of tools to help us mitigate damage. 

It starts with finding optimal locations away from construction, agriculture, and trees. Later, it means investing in regular cleaning, using either water, brushing, or an automated system. Monitoring systems also play a role in reducing the threat of poor performance and lost productivity. 

The solar industry is booming, not only in the U.S. but around the world. As technology improves, other innovative solutions will soon come to market, keeping our panels clean and our future bright.

Bright Idea: Converting Brownfields into Solar Farms

Posted on by bop-admin

Go for a drive anywhere in the United States, and you probably won’t be far from a current or former brownfield site. 

According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), more than 450,000 brownfields litter the U.S. But what is a brownfield, and why are governmental, public, and private organizations so interested in them? 

As it turns out, brownfields may play a vital role in our ongoing solar energy development. The EPA defines a brownfield site as “a property where expansion, redevelopment or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant.” 

Typically, brownfields are former locations used for industrial or commercial activities, including manufacturing, storage, or processing. Using this explanation, examples include factories, gas stations, railyards, and landfills. 

Unfortunately, their ties to chemicals, heavy metals, and other potential pollutants make them unattractive development sites. Unlike greenfield locations, which are undeveloped pieces of land ripe for expansion, brownfields require rehabilitation before use. 

Not Every Brownfield is the Same 

Although every brownfield requires cleanup before reuse, some need more than others. 

Depending on the location and surrounding area, rehabilitation could be worthwhile. Some sites have found new lives as golf courses, offices, shopping areas, mixed-use spaces, and even solar farms. 

But none of this happens without investment, and even then, it could be years before a site is ready for development. However, with enough time, money, and work, formerly forgotten properties can find new life and return to the tax rolls. 

From Brown to Bright 

One type of brownfield receiving a lot of interest from the solar community these days is landfills. 

Landfills are disposal sites for municipal solid waste (MSW), construction and demolition debris (D&C), and hazardous waste. There are two types of facilities: Subtitle D programs, which include non-hazardous municipal and industrial solid waste, and Subtitle C programs, which accept hazardous waste. 

Depending on the location, your local dump can operate for decades, collecting and compacting community garbage. But, like everything else in life, the good times have to end eventually, setting the stage for decommissioning. 

Once the landfill reaches capacity, workers pack it down, install mitigation systems for gas and water to escape, cap it with soil and plants to prevent contamination, and closely monitor it for 30 years.  

While this might seem like the end of the story, solar energy is breathing new life into former dumps. 

Making Something Out of Nothing 

According to a 2021 RMI report, the U.S. has over 10,000 closed or inactive landfill sites. 

Seeing an opportunity, the EPA launched the RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative. The program promotes renewable energy projects on former industrial sites like landfills, mines, and other forgotten places. 

So far, the RE-Powering program has completed 530 projects and installed 2,580 MW of power, including 93% from solar and 5% wind. Even more importantly, the program has completed brownfield redevelopment projects in nearly every U.S. state. 

Every state is different, but some offer financial incentives or streamlined permitting processes to rehabilitate brownfields. Certain states, like New Jersey, New York, and Massachusetts, offer both! 

But what has the program done for former dumping grounds? 

Small Projects, Massive Impact 

Of the 530 projects touted by the RE-Powering program, 60% (318) sit on top of landfills or landfill buffers. Though most of the solar projects generate less than 5MW of power, 16 produce more than 20MW of electricity. 

The EPA’s RE-Powering program is only one of many federal, state, and local projects promoting brownfield redevelopment. For example, Governmental agencies like the Departments of Energy and Transportation tackle national initiatives, while others, like the Appalachian Regional Commission, focus on specific areas. 

According to the EPA, its programs and grants, including the Brownfields Revitalization Act, are making a difference. Through 2023, grant recipients leveraged about $20 per EPA brownfield grant dollar received. But grant money is often only one part of the brownfield puzzle. The agency highlights strong partnerships between local governments, organizations, and public/private groups to find more money. 

Despite the financial costs, federal, state, and local initiatives are addressing several long-term issues at the same time. They are finding new and creative ways to reuse brownfields and meet increasing electricity demand. 

Why Landfills Make Great Solar Sites 

Let’s be real: landfills are often not great spots to put a community park. However, they’re excellent places to set up a solar site. 

But what makes a landfill conversion so alluring for solar development? Turns out former dumping grounds are a popular choice for several reasons. 

  • Landfills are not prime real estate development targets. They require money, time, and labor to rehabilitate and carry the stigma of former pollution. 
  • Dumps tend to be in areas near roads and electrical transmission lines. Their placement makes it easier for solar energy producers to move power from the site to the electrical grid. 
  • Landfill sites may already be zoned for renewable energy development, streamlining the planning and permitting process. 
  • Solar sites near populated areas like towns may have access to guaranteed power buyers, especially in high-demand regions. 
  • Landfills have a welcoming landscape for solar energy, with little shade, unobstructed views, and even hilltop access in some instances. 
  • The land is typically cheap, making it attractive for some buyers willing to pay for rehabilitation. 
  • Depending on their size, dumps can accommodate community- or even utility-scale projects. 

Combine this with the growing number of local and state incentives available, and it makes sense why landfills have become part of the clean energy game plan. 

Potential Concerns 

Like any other prospective site, former landfills come with considerations affecting the project. 

Brownfields require special attention because of former pollution, hazardous waste, or other environmental concerns. Bulldozing everything in sight creates more problems than solutions, and developers must show restraint. 

Solar developers need to be careful around the cap.  

Grading the land is one of the first things developers do when they install a solar array. Unfortunately, grating and excavating to level land for the solar racking can damage the cap. If equipment damages the cap, contaminants and gas could escape into the air and water. 

To prevent unnecessary damage, stage heavy equipment away from the cap. If crews need to grade or excavate the area, do it carefully. And ALWAYS follow state and federal rules to avoid dangerous situations. 

Don’t penetrate the cap or damage the landfill’s mitigation system. 

The cap prevents methane and other gases from escaping outside specially controlled areas. Damage to the system could result in dangerous leaks that put the entire operation at risk. 

If an employee damages the mitigation, monitoring, piping, or other systems, it could result in dangerous gases escaping. The gas could then ignite if it encounters an accidental spark or arc. 

Dust poses a risk to workers and the community. 

Dust is simply part of the job during every solar installation but takes on a different tone at a landfill site. 

During grading and installation for a standard solar project, most crews use water trucks to moisten dirt and keep dust from flying around. The problem is that water trucks are heavy. 

Heavy water trucks and other equipment can damage underground gas and drainage systems. They should not drive on the cap if they don’t need to and be careful when required to be near fragile systems.  

Erosion and stormwater runoff are always a threat. 

Landfills have systems in place to remove water from a capped site. When rain or other liquid enters the landfill, these systems quickly flush it out to prevent damage. 

When crews grade and excavate sites, it opens the door for moisture to enter the system. Grading removes vegetation and dirt from the top of the cap, allowing water to penetrate. When that happens, it can flood landfill gas piping, preventing gas extraction. 

Hard rain can cause more cap erosion and slope instability, reducing the cap’s effectiveness. 

New Life for Old Sites 

Thanks to their location and design, landfills have become an attractive choice for solar companies. 

Beyond generating low-cost electricity on redeveloped land, landfill solar farms create a host of other benefits, including: 

  • High-paying jobs in a rapidly expanding solar industry 
  • Increase tax revenue for communities where solar farms live. Solar companies reintroduce vacant or abandoned properties to the tax roll. 
  • Fewer brownfields. When companies clean up and redevelop sites, they remove many (but not all) contaminants from the location. 

As solar energy expands across the U.S., more landfills will inevitably become solar sites. For solar EPCs, utilities, and innovative companies, there are plenty of opportunities to take advantage of ongoing development programs.  

These programs streamline the solar process, especially in states embracing renewable energy across the Northeast and mid-Atlantic. Other programs may be available on a state-by-state basis but could require more research. 

Are you interested in brownfield redevelopment? Programs like the RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative are changing the landscape, but it’s a long-term effort requiring time, money, and work. 

Talk with your state’s environmental representatives or contact your regional EPA office to learn more.

PURPA 101: How a 45-Year-Old Law Impacts Solar EPCs Today

Posted on by Mike Zimm

When the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) was signed into law on November 9, 1978, it put the wheels in motion for renewable energy to thrive. 

PURPA was designed to address an oil crisis that had gripped the United States throughout the early 1970s and prevent future issues from happening by fostering more domestic energy independence, and its goals were simple:

  • Address and improve U.S. electric use 
  • Create pathways for better electrical utility energy efficiency 
  • Drive better rates for consumers and increase market competition 
  • Provide avenues for renewable energy development 

At the time of PURPA’s enactment, hydroelectric was a major renewable energy player. Since then, the industry has exploded with the expansion of solar energy systems, wind turbines, geothermal, biomass, and others. 

Several forward-thinking states, including New York, California, North Carolina, and Arizona, are leading the way. These states are investing in renewable energy at scale, enacting renewable portfolio standards, making permitting easier, and opening the door for companies to take advantage of substantial tax incentives. 

Today, more than 21% of our energy comes from renewable sources like solar and wind. We’ve also made massive strides toward diversifying energy sources while curbing fossil fuel use and making long-term commitments to renewable energy use.

What is PURPA? What Does It Do? 

Simply put, PURPA promotes energy diversification and competition in the electric generation industry. Though the word of the law sounds great, how does it translate to the real world? 

Qualifying Facilities and Avoided Costs 

Under PURPA, utilities must buy electricity from qualifying facilities at an “avoided cost.” This might sound like a packed sentence full of industry jargon, but the process allows utilities and renewable energy generators to work together peacefully. 

The first thing to do is explain what qualifying facilities (QFs) are. A qualifying facility is an energy production site generating less than 80MW of renewable power. It can also be a small co-generation plant producing electricity and thermal energy using a singular fuel source. Depending on the situation, the site must fit the descriptions in 16 U.S.C. §796(18)(A) and 18 CFR 292.203. 

Now that qualifying facilities have been explained, it’s time to move on to avoided costs. Avoided costs are the amount a utility company must pay a renewable energy generator for its energy. The cost is equal to the amount the utility would avoid by not producing the same amount of electricity but can be based on other negotiated rates. 

The avoided cost rules were updated with 2005’s Energy Policy Act, removing the mandatory purchasing rule for utilities in competitive wholesale markets for qualifying facilities larger than 20 MW. The rule remained unchanged for smaller electric power generators producing less than 20 MW, even in competitive markets.

Who Benefits from Avoided Costs? 

Avoided costs sound like something designed to handcuff utilities to renewable producers, but both operators benefit. 

Utilities avoid generating electricity when they don’t have to, leaving room for increased capacity when more power is needed. Purchasing electricity from companies using renewable sources like solar panels and wind turbines also helps offset pollution caused by traditional fossil fuels like coal, oil, or natural gas. 

Renewable energy producers benefit from avoided costs because they receive a guaranteed market to sell into. Because the utility must buy electricity from the renewable generating company, solar EPCs (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) can better manage costs associated with installing panels, interconnections, and everything else tied to coming online. 

Renewable companies also qualify for state and federal exemptions that help reduce operational friction. These include mandatory purchase agreements, interconnection guarantees, and other requirements like public utility regulation and taxation from states. The rules help get renewable projects off the ground more quickly and profitably so they can start supplying electricity to consumers.

Why PURPA Makes Sense for Solar 

Although PURPA supports all types of renewable power, solar energy producers have taken advantage of the law in several ways. 

Fair Competition – Consumers get lower costs for electricity based on available and affordable options. By requiring utilities to buy renewable power, consumers benefit from more energy diversity and can choose what power they want. 

Environmentally Friendly – PURPA has been instrumental in adding more than 100 GW of renewable electricity to the grid. The increase in renewable power has also lowered our dependence on domestic and foreign fossil fuels while bolstering clean energy. 

Better Financing – Several tax credits associated with PURPA make it easier and affordable for solar EPCs to establish energy projects. Investment Tax Credits (ITCs), Production Tax Credits (PTCs), and even property and sales tax exemptions are just a few credits installers enjoy. 

Rules also provide small solar sites with a safety net in the form of guaranteed energy purchasers and markets. 

PURPA Gets an Update 

The 1970s had its share of turbulence, and the U.S. economy was much different than it is today. 

When PURPA was signed into law, the country had just recovered from a severe oil crisis, and there were legitimate concerns about natural gas supplies. Today, we have vast natural gas stores and low-cost energy production methods. 

Unfortunately, the gas crisis of the 1970s has been replaced by climate concerns, and countries are pushing to become carbon neutral by 2050. The situation has forced the U.S. to reexamine what PURPA is trying to accomplish and rework the law to fit today’s changing needs. 

The law has been through several amendments, most recently in 2020. Order 872 has been controversial but modernized several parts of PURPA to fit today’s economic climate. Depending on who you ask, the changes aren’t all for the better, but the goal is to make things as fair as possible for solar installers, utilities, and end consumers.

Avoided Costs Get Adjusted 

In the early days of PURPA, utilities could be locked into long-term fixed energy rates that sometimes meant paying far more for electricity than it cost to produce. 

The new rule allows for more flexibility in pricing using multiple indexes and sources, making for a better, more accurate, and transparent pricing structure. Though the rule impacts costs, it doesn’t touch capacity rates, which control how much electricity is produced. Still, losing the long-term energy pricing contracts could make it harder for solar installers to finance projects. 

Order 872 also changed the criteria for locking in long-term contracts. Previously, projects could lock in using power purchase or other agreements. Now it is moving toward companies showing financial viability before finalizing contracts.

The One Mile Rule 

Under the old rule, capacity was capped at 80 MW for same-site facilities, including energy facilities of the same type found within a mile of a Qualifying Facility. 

The new rule is similar but adds a 10-mile rebuttal. Anything further than 10 miles from the QF is now considered a separate site. This means facilities with the same power source less than 10 miles from a QF can qualify as the same site, including them in the 80 MW capacity.

Competitive Market Access 

Under this rule, utilities can avoid power purchase agreements if the Qualifying Facilities can access competitive markets. 

The old rule established the threshold for QFs to sell to utilities for avoided costs at 20 MW but has been lowered to only 5 MW. One wrinkle in the rule is that the lower threshold applies to power production but not co-generation plants.

Potential Concerns 

Though PURPA’s amendments impact utilities and solar companies, the goal is a steady supply of clean energy from multiple sources at prices the average consumer can afford.  

The changes also have the unintended effect of altering the relationship between the two entities – sometimes not for the betterment of solar installers. Ditching fixed revenue streams may create problems for companies wanting to build but can’t rely on receiving a steady check. Variable revenues mean companies are tied to the market rather than standard avoided cost metrics. 

Lower mandatory purchasing size thresholds also mean less market certainty against more competition. If there’s too much risk, it could have a chilling effect on solar EPCs and other renewable builders.

PURPA Changes Are Mixed 

The new rules have been around for about 3 years, and we’ve seen a few trends developing. 

Solar Isn’t Slowing – It was feared at first that solar development would be shaken. If anything, the pace has increased, especially as the government pushes for renewable energy development. 

Consumers Are in Control – Today’s electricity customers benefit from lower costs and have more electricity options than ever, including emerging renewable sources like solar and wind. 

Utilities Made Some Gains – Utilities have the right to negotiate for variable avoided cost rates that don’t tie them to a potentially costly contract. They also have the power to define rates based on several indexes and economic factors. 

Time will tell how these changes shape the industry landscape, but overall, PURPA has been a boon for the solar industry. Even as conditions change, it’s only fair the rules guiding us adapt and grow alongside it, too.

How Do Solar Investment Tax Credit Adders Work?

Posted on by Mike Zimm

When it comes to the government, there’s no such thing as a simple, straightforward solution. 

Unfortunately, for developers, financiers, and engineering, procurement, and construction companies, known as EPCs, that means knowing when, how, and where projects qualify for federal solar tax credits. Without them, it’s harder to complete jobs quickly and effectively. 

When the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was signed into law, it opened the door for a massive uptick in tax credits for solar. However, not everyone qualifies for all the tax credits, and plenty of intricate rules must be followed to receive them. 

Projects can qualify for ITC solar credits up to 60%, with adders tied to domestic materials and products, location, and low-income communities. 

But what projects qualify for federal funding? 

What is the Base ITC Credit? 

When the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law, it extended the shelf life of the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) for solar installations and increased its value. 

From now until 2032, solar credits for projects are 30% and apply to businesses and homeowners. After 2032, the credit decreases until it’s finally sunset. For utility-scale solar projects larger than 1MW, the tax credit is 6% but rises to 30% if several criteria are met.  

But what are the criteria, you ask? 

For starters, a project qualifies for the 30% credit if workers are paid prevailing wages. The project also requires a certain number of apprentices to perform the work. There are also rules for apprentice-to-journeyman worker ratios, as outlined by the Department of Labor. 

Accessing the 10% ITC Adder 

Qualifying for the 10% domestic production adder requires projects to satisfy three criteria: 

  • Must be in the United States or an associated territory  
  • Must use new or like new equipment (cannot exceed a certain threshold of used parts)  
  • Cannot be leased to a tax-except entity  

The first 10% Investment Tax Credit available is the domestic content adder. As the name implies, projects must use a certain percentage of U.S.-produced materials to qualify. In the case of steel and iron, 100% of those materials must be U.S.-made as outlined by American Iron and Steel (AIS) rules, meaning everything from sourcing to final finishing has to take place in the United States. 

With that said, the domestic content adder does not apply to subcomponents used for the project, including nuts, bolts, washers, etc. 

Meeting the Project Threshold 

As with any federal funding project, businesses must meet certain criteria before accessing the federal tax credit. 

For the 10% ITC adder, manufactured products must comprise at least 40% of the total project cost. Over time, the threshold will rise, meaning more domestic products are needed to receive funding. 

Offshore wind projects will follow a similar rising threshold schedule, but only 20% of the total cost-adjusted percentage needs to be tied to U.S. manufactured products for now. 

The percentages increase over time, as seen in the table below. 

Year Domestic Product Threshold – Solar Domestic Product Threshold – Offshore Wind 
Before 2025 40% 20% 
2025 45% 27.5% 
2026 50% 35% 
2027 55% 45% 

The threshold for offshore wind will eventually reach 55% after 2027 to match solar projects.

Of course, the rules aren’t as black-and-white as one would hope, and there are breakdowns for how products are classified as domestic or foreign-made. 

For example, only components mined or made in the U.S. count toward the total adjusted content rule. Let’s say you’re using a widget made with three components – two are domestically made, but the third was manufactured overseas. Although the widget was U.S.-made, you only get credit for the two domestically produced components. 

The cost of the foreign-made component would be subtracted from the total cost of the widget, leaving you with the cost of the U.S.-made parts. Whatever that percentage is counts toward the total cost. 

It’s a lot to manage, but the rule is simple: If a component, product, or material is made in the U.S., it counts! But besides the domestic manufacturing component associated with the adder, projects also need to meet one of several conditions, including: 

  • The project has an installed capacity of less than 1MW AC  
  • Construction began before Jan. 29, 2023  
  • It meets prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements  

Projects meeting one of these conditions are eligible for the 10% credit. 

Concerns About the Threshold 

One common concern from solar EPCs is the difficulty of hitting the domestic product threshold due to a lack of U.S.-based manufacturers for solar products. 

Solar companies have had trouble getting ahold of critical solar power system parts, including solar panels, inverters, BOS components, and racking materials. As the threshold rises, some installers fear the 10% ITC will be too difficult to reach. 

In 2022, the government issued a moratorium on solar tariffs, opening the door for cheaper panels and parts from Asian countries. Though it brings an influx of cheap parts to help installers catch up on delayed projects, they also jeopardize the chances of their solar energy system receiving the renewable energy tax credit. 

Ramping Up Domestic Production 

The moratorium was offered, in part, to keep solar projects moving while domestic manufacturers got up to speed.  

While increased federal support is a boon for companies trying to take market share from foreign competitors, the investment is a long-term strategy that leaves current problems unsolved. 

First Solar is the major solar panel producer in the U.S., but the company does not have the size to meet current demand. Other solar manufacturers include, but are not limited to, Heliene, Mission Solar, JinkoSolar, SunPower, Silfab Solar, and Hanwha Qcells, which all produce different parts of the BOS, but have also struggled to meet U.S. demand in recent years. 

However, several brands, including Qcells, have announced expansion plans in the coming years to support increased demand. For example, Qcells’ expansion in Georgia will add 2,500 jobs and double production at the facility by 2024. 

Other Available Solar Project Credits 

It might seem too good to be true, but the 30% ITC credit can rise as high as 60% in certain situations. 

Energy Community Bonus 

Solar projects can earn an additional 10% credit for building in a former energy community. What’s an energy community? It’s a location that is either a former brownfield site or a facility where coal, oil, or natural gas are mined or converted into energy. 

If the site isn’t a brownfield, the project could still qualify if it satisfies one of several other criteria, including: 

  • Either .17% direct employment OR at least 25% of local tax revenue from coal, oil, or natural gas production or storage AND an unemployment rate higher than the national average 
  • Housed a coal mine that closed after 1999 OR a coal electric plant retired after 2009 

Although many parts of the country qualify under at least one of these conditions, some sections don’t, including much of the Midwest. 

Keep in mind that energy communities should NOT be confused with low-income areas. 

Low-Income Bonus 

This 10% credit is awarded to solar projects that sell electricity to lower-income areas and is for solar installations smaller than 5MW. 

What’s interesting about this clean energy adder is that it has two tiers. Projects receive a 10% ITC if they’re located in a low-income community or on Native American land. If the installation is a qualified low-income residential building project, which, according to the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, requires “financial benefits of the solar facility must be allocated equitably between the residents,” it receives a 20% ITC. 

The Credits Are Complicated, But They Have to Be 

When the government gets involved, it typically comes with heaps of regulatory red tape, but the complexity of this program is vital for a few reasons. 

Tying an ITC or PTC to the program encourages solar companies to buy American-made products, bolstering the economy and decreasing reliance on foreign-made goods like solar panels, racking, and PV wire. 

Programs like this also help with nearshoring and reshoring manufacturing efforts. When domestic goods are prioritized, installers benefit from lower shipping costs, including tariffs and duties, since the material has a shorter shipping distance. 

With higher demand, companies can hire and support additional jobs in emerging industries. These careers often pay well and offer room for advancement, making it possible to make a living in a burgeoning market. It’s also important to consider where the jobs are going. Establishing companies and projects in economically depressed areas and locations where fossil fuel plants once stood keeps jobs in those communities and even adds new ones. 

Credits Keep Solar Moving 

The U.S. is moving toward a sustainable future, but can solar tax credits work? 

Solar is surging in the United States, not just because it produces low-cost energy for communities alongside hundreds of thousands of jobs. Installations can stabilize the electrical grid using new technology, keeping the lights on in homes. As the technology improves, solar could be a low-cost alternative to fossil fuels, reliably producing clean, renewable energy. 

Renewable energy still has a long way to go to become the primary power source for the U.S., but a monumental shift is possible with a clear focus on solutions.

Factory vs. Field-Made: Comparing Solar Connectors

Posted on by Mike Zimm

Utility-scale solar installations have a lot of fragile parts and pieces. Small issues can result in thousands of dollars’ worth of lost energy, system damage, or even a fire. 

According to HelioVolta’s SolarGrade PV Health Report, nearly 60% of solar installation issues were attributed to field-made connectors or wire management. Field-made connector issues alone attributed to one-third of all problems at solar sites. Within that segment, the percentage of critical and major issues attributed to field-made connectors was higher than any other damage type. 

It’s fair to say connectors are a concern, but it helps to know when and how the connectors were made. Field-made connectors are installed on-site by workers, compared to factory-made ones attached to PV wire during production.  

With that in mind, the blame then falls on either the connector or the worker who assembled it. 

With so much money and energy on the line, companies must reduce liability and increase their installations’ reliability. Could factory-made connectors improve overall production and dependability? 

The Difference Between Field and Factory-Made Solar Connectors 

Companies have two options for connectors for a utility-scale solar power array: factory-made connectors or field-made solar connectors. 

Factory-made connectors are installed onto the wire in a controlled environment. Performing the work in a manufacturing facility makes it easier to spot quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) issues so bad connectors aren’t sent out to the field. 

When PV wire connectors are made in the field, they’re assembled by solar installers. Typically, field-made connectors are used to ensure connectors aren’t cross-mated with other “compatible” parts. During this process, workers use certified pieces and tools supplied by a manufacturer and then do the work themselves. The important thing to remember here is that both the parts and the tools are certified, meaning installers should only use what was supplied to them by the manufacturer. 

Although several connector types exist on the market, some are more common than others. MC4 connectors, using a plug-and-socket method, are the current standard, and Swiss manufacturer Staubli is the original developer and manufacturer. Since the MC4’s inception, many other companies have started making their own compatible connectors, leading to a growing number of connector manufacturers and parts to choose from. 
 
The problem is although there is a certification process for the connectors, cross-mated parts aren’t usually tested together as a single unit. 

One Size Doesn’t Fit All 

There are several types of connectors used in solar operations, including the MC4, MC3 (phased out by MC4), and Amphenol Helios models, but you can’t always use one with another. 

While it might not seem like a big deal mixing and matching connectors across a solar site, HelioVolta noted in its SolarGrade report that pieces were either improperly installed or cross-mated in nearly 80% of field-made connector issues. 

As installers rush to catch up with delayed projects and set up new sites, the resulting time crunch opens the door for mistakes. The industry is also growing, leading to an influx of junior installers who may not have enough experience to perform the job well. 

What Does This Mean for Solar Sites? 

Connector issues set the stage for several problems. From water and moisture exposure, bad PV connector points, and damaged wires from bad crimps or other mistakes, every issue could open the door to a costly disaster. 

So, what happens when a PV system has connector issues? Quite a lot, actually: 

  • Lost power and outages – When connectors fail, the solar panel is no longer reliably connected to the Balance of System (BOS). When that happens, the system produces less energy. 
  • Ground faults or arcing – Ground faults and arcs occur when there isn’t good contact in the connector. Heat expands the parts over time, opening gaps and eventually creating an arc that can damage surrounding wires and materials. 
  • Fires – When fires break out, they can quickly cause millions of dollars in damage. Once the fire is out, crews need to replace damaged and charred parts, adding sunk time and labor costs to the total bill. 

Not every field-made connector is an inherent fire risk, but they may carry more risk than factory-made parts, according to HelioVolta’s data. 

Avoiding Connector Issues 

Limiting the number of fail points is critical when dealing with large utility-scale installations. 

Buying factory-made connectors addresses a crucial failure point, setting your solar energy project up for better long-term success. 

According to the SolarGrade PV Health Report, only 6% of issues at solar arrays were tied to factory-made connectors, much less than the 33% associated with their field-made counterparts. Manufacturer-made parts also reduce on-site critical and major problems, thanks to each manufacturer’s rigorous QC and QA programs. 

The Best Connector for the Wire 

Another benefit of factory-made connectors is that manufacturers can use compatible products with their wire and cable. The result is a more reliable connection, thanks to a standardized process retaining integrity across the board. 
 
Installers may rush or get stretched thin, limiting their attention, resulting in potentially loose or poor connections. Furthermore, unlike field-made connectors that may lack QA assurance from another worker in the field, most manufacturers have staff on hand to spot potential concerns before the wire leaves the factory. 

What Do Bad Connectors Look Like? 

No matter what type of connector is used, you should know what damage looks like. 

We recommend having crews inspect solar sites once every 6 months or so and check every connection point for common problems, including: 

  • Gaps 
  • Cross-threading 
  • Sun Damage 
  • Overheating 
  • Other connector or wire damage 

One of the easiest mistakes to make is using incompatible connectors. When connectors are cross-mated without checking for compatibility, it can put the solar installation at risk. Mismatched connections can generate a lot of heat, making them easy to spot with a temperature gauge. 

It’s also important to ensure every installer is trained to properly work on solar panels, cabling and other balance of system (BOS) pieces. 

Know What You’re Getting 

Simply put – buying factory-made connectors reduces risk. 

Manufacturers have strict quality control standards to prevent damaged or improperly assembled connectors from being shipped out to the field in the first place. If bad parts do get shipped, they can also work alongside customers to quickly correct mistakes before dangerous situations develop. 

Not all field-made connectors will have issues, and many will be fine. But when the goal is to limit risk and liability on your renewable energy project, factory-made connectors are the way to go.

Avoiding Connector Issues on Utility-Scale Solar Sites

Posted on by Mike Zimm

Installation costs, labor, and product reliability often go together when bringing utility-scale solar projects online. 

Despite declining hard and soft costs, there is still pressure to deliver projects on time and under budget. This means installers look for every way to save time and money. 

Material and labor costs usually provide some savings, but the solutions aren’t always elegant. One issue creeping into the solar conversation is the reliability of PV wire connectors and harnesses that cut down on labor but increase the number of fail points in the balance of system (BOS). 

When crews use harnesses, it means more connectors to bring wires together. More connections generally mean more opportunities for issues. Whether it’s installation related, tied to the weather, or just a random event, solar panels can’t do their job if connectors break. 

By limiting the number of PV cable connectors, installers reduce the number of fail points and increase reliability. 

Why Companies Use Connectors 

Every solar project will require MC4 connectors, but the number needed depends on how the installer approaches the problem. 

When companies use Sun-Pull bundled PV wire, it’s a 1:1 connection. This means one wire, one string, and one connector from the solar panel to the combiner box. Although the bundle has individual #10 AWG conductors, they can be terminated at different points along the run. As a result, workers only have to move down the line once. 

If a company decides to increase the number of connectors used, it would need about half the amount of wire compared to a bundled cable solution. They could also use a larger gauge wire (in this case, #8 AWG) than the #10 AWG used in the bundled wire, reducing electricity lost from the solar panel to the combiner box. 

Using connectors across the solar array sounds like a slam dunk, but several drawbacks complicate matters. 

No Real Cost Savings 

Although the installer needs about half the wire, the larger gauge wire eats into the cost savings. Not to mention, the project now requires harnesses and additional connectors to complete the job. All told, the savings are nearly negligible. 

The company might find labor cost savings, which are reduced since workers are installing less wire. Using more connectors saves labor hours, but crews still need to take multiple trips down the line. 

“It’s a less elegant method,” Sun-Pull Wire President Nick Eberly explained. “It will cut your labor in half, you only have to go down that row half the number of times because you’re installing a harness, but you’re installing double the number of connectors. You’re also still going down the row multiple times, compared to a bundled wire which requires going down the line once.” 

More Connections, More Failure Points 

It might not seem like a big deal, but too many connectors can cripple solar installations. 

If you’ve ever left something plastic outside, you’ve likely seen firsthand what the elements do to it over time. The same can be said about the plastic housing connectors have that protect the pins and sockets inside. 

When joining PV panels to the combiner box, the plastic connector pieces are exposed to the elements, eventually degrading them. Although they’re sunlight resistant, they’re still vulnerable to excess moisture, snow, and other environmental factors. If water sneaks into the connector, it can create a short. 

“If you have a piece of wire that’s insulated, that can stay outside for a really long time in the elements,” Eberly explained. “Wherever you put that connector, that’s generally going to fail quicker than the wire itself. And every time one of those connectors blows, a fuse blows too. That lowers the output, and then you have to fix that.” 

Eberly suggests a single conductor approach that eliminates as many connectors as possible. In this scenario, a wire runs from the solar panel to the combiner box, keeping sensitive pieces safe while limiting exposure. 

It’s Not Always the Connector’s Fault 

Sometimes connectors fail through no fault of their own – they get a little help from some unlikely sources. 

The products widely used today are called MC4 connectors and were developed by Staubli, a Swiss manufacturer. Although the company owns about one-third of the product’s global market share, hundreds of global connector manufacturers exist, mostly in Asia. Unfortunately, there isn’t a universal standard, meaning manufacturers can produce similar products with subtle differences that could impact performance. 

Beyond manufacturing, installers may cause connector failures. From putting connectors on backward and not crimping them hard enough to crimping the surrounding wire insulation, cross-threading, or under/over-torquing them, problems can occur. 

As a result, issues could range from a loss of electrical output and performance to full-blown fires. 

According to a 2019 Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems report, many connector failures found on utility-scale solar arrays happen within the first five years. Additionally, a joint study by PVEL and HelioVolta found connector issues in more than 70% of commercial and industrial projects analyzed by HelioVolta. 

With so many variations on the market, it’s difficult to ensure quality, leading to potential delays and setbacks. And when harnesses are used, connector failures often mean the whole harness needs to be replaced. 

Small Parts, Huge Impact 

Connectors may not seem like a big deal, but there’s a cascading effect whenever one fails. 

Let’s say a connector fails at a large solar project. The system loses output because of the damaged connector, and the piece could create a situation where arcs, sparks, or fire occur. 

When that happens, the utility or company has to pay labor costs for workers to go out and fix the damage and material costs for a new connector, PV wire, and other BOS parts. The company also loses money because the system isn’t generating as much power, leading to lower profits and potentially unhappy customers. 

This isn’t to say every connector failure will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to repair. But when multiple connectors fail on a large site, several tiny problems can become a giant headache. 

One (String) and Done 

There isn’t one way to wire a utility-scale solar power site, but it’s possible to save time, labor, and money by finding a system that works well for you. 

Bundled PV wire is a simple solution that reduces fail points from the solar panels to the combiner box and lets workers travel each row once. There’s also no need for harnesses or multiple connection points to connect wires. It’s a safer, more reliable system with less risk of failures, such as electrical arcing or dangerous contact with DC electricity. 

Like other types of renewable energy, solar is on the rise. Of course, work must be done to fully standardize the process, but the necessary steps are taking place. According to PVEL, the NEC was revised in 2020 to require connector pairs to be tested and certified for intermateability. It’s one small step toward a universal process in the United States. 

Connectors are only one piece of a solar BOS, but they’re a potential weak point. Finding solutions that need fewer parts and are more reliable makes it easier to save money on future projects and speeds up the nation’s move away from fossil fuels.

What Happens If the U.S. Reinstates Solar Panel Tariffs?

Posted on by Mike Zimm

For the most part, this has been a good year for the solar industry. 

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) supercharged the industry, creating billions of dollars in investments. It also led to announcements of more than two dozen solar manufacturing facilities and 10 utility-scale battery storage manufacturing plants across the United States. 

The IRA isn’t the only thing adding fuel to the solar industry’s fire. Growth can also be attributed to the Biden administration’s 24-month moratorium on solar panels coming from four Asian counties. The move allows Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam to sell low-cost solar panels to U.S. companies and gives stateside producers time to ramp up production. 

A Bumpy Road 

While everything seems fine on the surface, solar installers face rising uncertainty from Congress. A bipartisan effort to reinstate the tariffs has moved through the House and Senate but was vetoed by Biden in mid-May. 

According to lawmakers, overturning the moratorium would be a rebuke of the Chinese government, spurring domestic production and investment. The problem is that reinstating the tariffs would potentially derail solar installations and investments without guaranteeing U.S. manufacturers can fill the void. 

What does reinstating tariffs mean for the rapidly expanding solar industry? Based on earlier experience, there are several things we can expect. 

Market Uncertainty 

When something changes in the market, everyone has to adjust. 

From a supply chain standpoint, reducing the flow of low-cost solar panels from Asia can delay projects. It also forces manufacturers to source materials elsewhere or jumpstart domestic production to keep shipping panels. 

Meanwhile, distributors must scramble to get the products they need for installers, who, in turn, struggle with having the right amount of labor available. The labor aspect is especially important. According to Abigail Ross Hopper with the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), Congress’ move to overturn the moratorium could affect up to 30,000 jobs. 

Since the tariff decision was made last year, there has been a drastic increase in solar projects across the country. During COVID, supply chain issues created delays for many projects. With a wave of new panels, those installations have picked up again. It’s also encouraged other companies to make announcements for upcoming solar projects. 

The problem is reinstating the tariff. In a burgeoning industry like solar, market uncertainty can halt new investments. When companies can’t plan or forecast, they struggle to find the budget to complete projects. Then, they get delayed or shelved until market conditions improve. 

Strained Geopolitical Relationships 

One of the main reasons the solar panel tariff was introduced was due to an ongoing trade war with China. 

On several occasions, the U.S. has accused China of “dumping” materials into the American market, creating conditions that make it hard for domestic producers to compete. Dumping, as the name implies, occurs when a country sells raw materials, products, or other goods in another market at a low price, sometimes less than the cost to produce it. 

When dumping occurs, domestic producers are forced to sell their products at a higher price and potentially lose market share or lower prices to compete. In either case, it can hurt competition in the buying country’s market and disrupt the economy. 

U.S. officials believe China is going through Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam to skirt anti-dumping regulations and get solar panels into the U.S. market. Reinstating the solar panel tariff may not directly impact China, but could cause a rippling effect, further hurting the relationship between the two superpowers. 

There is one positive aspect to this situation, though. With tariffs on solar panel imports, domestic producers will have room to ramp up production to meet clean energy demand. 

Higher Short-Term Pricing 

When there’s less product to go around, prices naturally rise. 

Shortly after President Biden suspended solar panel tariffs, companies jumped at the opportunity to buy low-cost panels from overseas. Prices dropped because there was enough supply to meet growing demand in the U.S. Unfortunately, that would change if tariffs were reinstated. 

Think of it this way: eggs are typically cheap and don’t often fluctuate in price because demand is generally constant, as is supply. But earlier this year, prices skyrocketed after avian flu reduced the number of eggs produced while demand was unchanged. As egg producers fought to catch up, the cost of eggs exploded by double digits, with people sometimes paying $5 or more per dozen. Today, prices are slightly higher than last year, but we’re nearly back to equilibrium. 

So, let’s use the same supply and demand lens on the solar panel situation. What would happen if the steady supply of low-cost panels became severely restricted? In the short term, prices would spike as supplies dwindled and demand stayed high. Prices will jump if domestic producers and manufacturers in other countries don’t fill the immediate void. 

Once manufacturers in the U.S. increase their output, costs will come down until reaching an equilibrium price. 

More Domestic Investment 

Although having an influx of solar panels is great for the burgeoning solar industry, Congress has a good reason for reinstating the tariffs; legislators want to see domestic producers in control. 

For all intents and purposes, the White House has promoted green energy economic development across the board, not just solar. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has been a boon for solar and other renewables, resulting in $150 billion in capital investments across many clean energy projects. 

It’s about more than simply making more panels and parts, though. Every investment in renewable development in the U.S. is an opportunity to create thousands of high-paying jobs in an expanding industry. Without a steady stream of utility-scale solar products, companies can’t predict labor needs. 

More production also gives the U.S. a chance to meet its high-level sustainability goals. According to the White House, the U.S. wants to reach 80% renewable energy generation by 2030 and 100% carbon-free electricity by 2035. They’re lofty goals, especially when nearly 80% of our energy was generated by fossil fuels in 2021. 

With more investment in renewable energy, there is a chance to turn the tide. According to the EIA (Energy Information Administration), total solar generation share could double from 3% in 2022 to 6% by 2024, thanks to lower production and installation costs combined with tax credits and other incentives. 

Where Do We Go from Here? 

No matter what happens with the tariffs, it’s important to remember the moratorium was only temporary. 

The stay was meant to give solar installers, companies, and utilities time to complete projects, increase production, and build a thriving U.S. solar market. Two years may not cover a manufacturer’s ramp-up timeline, but it gives installers time to work on projects while they get up to speed. 

It’s also worth noting that although tariff relief supports low-cost solar panels, the IRA has been doing the heavy lifting to create investment and manufacturing opportunities for companies. 

Repealing tariff relief on solar panels now may be a minor setback, but it shouldn’t cloud our view of what has been done so far. American manufacturing is growing, with companies like Sun-Pull producing critical infrastructure like bundled PV wire. Other companies are coming online soon, joining manufacturers who have found footing in the space, making panels and Balance of System (BOS) items. 

Renewable energy, including solar, is the future, but how we approach the coming years depends on our commitment to green energy and divesting from fossil fuels.  

Anything is possible, but we need to move quickly.

Production, Labor, and Land: The Push for Solar Energy

Posted on by Mike Zimm

You’ve probably seen renewable energy, including solar, receiving large-scale investments lately. 

It’s no surprise the solar industry is growing, especially given the world’s push to curb climate change. The U.S. solar market currently totals $35 billion and generates about 5% of our country’s electricity – nearly 11 times more than a decade ago. The trend is expected to continue, thanks to recent actions from the Biden administration, including the recently passed Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). 

The government’s actions are spurring excitement in the industry. Solar manufacturers are announcing large-scale production investments, including Qcells, Enel, Maxeon, and CubicPV. These projects are expected to increase domestic solar production more than five times, expanding from 7GW to more than 42GW. 

Though the IRA encourages companies to invest in renewable energy, the changing geopolitical climate plays a vital role. In 2022, a 24-month tariff moratorium was announced for solar panels coming into the U.S. from four Asian countries, including Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam. The stay allows U.S. companies to import low-cost solar panels from Asia while giving domestic manufacturers time to increase production. 

The utility-scale solar growth has been nice, but there are still barriers to success, including: 

  • Reliance on imports 
  • Permitting and regulatory red tape 
  • Ongoing labor issues 
  • Public skepticism of solar power 

Combatting these issues may supercharge the clean energy industry and allow for more utility-scale solar power domestically. 

Fewer Imports, Better Results 

China is a key player in the solar energy industry. Not only does it produce a large number of low-cost solar panels, but it’s also a leader in energy storage. 

Although China’s solar panels are inexpensive, they come at a cost. There are questions about the country’s skirting of duties applied to them, and their low cost has made it difficult for domestic manufacturers to compete. 

COVID also showed us that supply chains can be easily disrupted, making getting supplies quickly or reliably harder. 

Recent developments like the IRA may reduce U.S. reliance on other countries. Contrary to what that sounds like, it doesn’t mean the U.S. is cutting China or any other country out. We’re simply narrowing the supply chain and bringing more production stateside. 

Since the IRA became law, innovative companies have jumped in to support solar expansion, committing to producing everything from modules and inverters to batteries, copper foil, and photovoltaic (PV) wire. Even structural products like racking and trackers are showing signs of increased production as manufacturers take advantage of the changing business climate. 

Unfortunately, we can’t flip a switch and immediately start production. It can take months, even years, for production facilities to come online. However, the hope is that with enough lead time to get production moving, the U.S. can become competitive in the solar space. 

Streamlining the Permitting Process 

Let’s be honest; the government is a lot of things, but fast isn’t usually one of them. Despite the Biden administration helping installers get low-cost panels and freeing up billions of dollars to promote renewables, there’s more to do. 

The permitting process is different depending on where the installers are. Even the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has called the permitting process a “patchwork” of regulations varying from state to state. 

To make the process smoother, the EPA introduced a toolkit to help developers, utilities, and communities navigate regulations, secure financing, and troubleshoot issues. But organizations like the SEIA are calling for more permit reform. In their eyes, reducing red tape adds jet fuel to a burgeoning industry, opening the door for more jobs, revenue, and opportunity. 

Although there have been attempts to streamline the building process for companies to set up distributed energy systems, none have succeeded. For example, the bipartisan American Energy Opportunity Act of 2019 bill called on the Department of Energy (DOE) to designate a board to help qualify communities with solar systems and certify installers in the space. It died without a vote or any other action. 

Establishing Better Career Promotion and Labor Relations 

As with any growing industry, thousands of skilled and unskilled jobs are available. The problem is finding enough people to meet increasing needs. 

Unskilled labor is in high demand, but so is the need for electrical, process, and chemical engineers, scientists, architects, physicists, planners, and more. The jobs are certainly available, more so with the increased focus. 

More than 250,000 people work in the solar industry, with job growth in 47 of 50 U.S. states. Among them, California, Texas, New York, and Florida are at the forefront of hiring and employment. Even states traditionally tied to fossil fuels are beginning to lean into solar. 

The labor shortage doesn’t have to cripple solar. If private companies, utilities, colleges, and governments collaborate, it simplifies recruiting efforts and builds industry interest early on. Training programs, apprenticeships, and veterans programs are only a few ways to introduce new workers to renewable energy occupations. 

Creating Positive Perceptions 

For some people, solar is the future of electrical energy and a way to rely less on fossil fuels. Others see PV panels as another way to muck up a hillside view. 

Solar has plenty going for it, but it also has its fair share of detractors. Often helmed by rural mobilization efforts, arguments range from deforestation fears and aesthetic issues for homeowners to agricultural concerns. The truth is that solar installations aren’t nearly the nuisance people think they are. 

Think about the last time you looked at a swamp and thought, “Wow, what a great place to build!” Solar sites aren’t typically found where other development is attractive or possible.  

Swamps, steep hillsides, and farmland are great locations for utility-scale solar installations because they don’t interfere much with our daily lives. For example, one Sun-Pull solar installation is tucked in behind a correctional facility. Another is in what used to be an unused swamp area off a busy road. 

In the case of farmland, agrivoltaics is literally changing the solar landscape. Recent studies have shown that combining solar panels with grazing areas or cropland can benefit both the land and the panels. Unlike other solar installations, which only serve one application, agrivoltaics let property owners use the land while leasing it out. 

What’s important to remember is that education breeds awareness, especially in communities where solar is a practical solution. Better access to tools and information can alleviate concerns and encourage residents to learn more about community and utility-scale solar. 

Solar Goes Mainstream 

This is an exciting time to be in the solar industry, but there’s still more to do. 

The industry needs continued investment from private and public sources. An influx of money will spur production, job growth, and energy reliability as the world turns more toward renewables. 

Solar manufacturing and installation jobs pay well, have job security, and can help revolutionize the electrical utility industry. More workers also push innovation, better designs, and increased interest in revamping the electrical grid. 

Solar power is the future of energy. As installed capacities increase and technology improves, getting much of our energy from the sun, wind, and water will become commonplace. But it’s not all about getting away from fossil fuels; this is a move toward unlimited sustainable, clean energy. 

The renewable revolution is here. With a sustained effort, the U.S. is more than capable of reaching its lofty energy production goals.