PURPA 101: How a 45-Year-Old Law Impacts Solar EPCs Today

When the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) was signed into law on November 9, 1978, it put the wheels in motion for renewable energy to thrive. 

PURPA was designed to address an oil crisis that had gripped the United States throughout the early 1970s and prevent future issues from happening by fostering more domestic energy independence, and its goals were simple:

  • Address and improve U.S. electric use 
  • Create pathways for better electrical utility energy efficiency 
  • Drive better rates for consumers and increase market competition 
  • Provide avenues for renewable energy development 

At the time of PURPA’s enactment, hydroelectric was a major renewable energy player. Since then, the industry has exploded with the expansion of solar energy systems, wind turbines, geothermal, biomass, and others. 

Several forward-thinking states, including New York, California, North Carolina, and Arizona, are leading the way. These states are investing in renewable energy at scale, enacting renewable portfolio standards, making permitting easier, and opening the door for companies to take advantage of substantial tax incentives. 

Today, more than 21% of our energy comes from renewable sources like solar and wind. We’ve also made massive strides toward diversifying energy sources while curbing fossil fuel use and making long-term commitments to renewable energy use.

What is PURPA? What Does It Do? 

Simply put, PURPA promotes energy diversification and competition in the electric generation industry. Though the word of the law sounds great, how does it translate to the real world? 

Qualifying Facilities and Avoided Costs 

Under PURPA, utilities must buy electricity from qualifying facilities at an “avoided cost.” This might sound like a packed sentence full of industry jargon, but the process allows utilities and renewable energy generators to work together peacefully. 

The first thing to do is explain what qualifying facilities (QFs) are. A qualifying facility is an energy production site generating less than 80MW of renewable power. It can also be a small co-generation plant producing electricity and thermal energy using a singular fuel source. Depending on the situation, the site must fit the descriptions in 16 U.S.C. §796(18)(A) and 18 CFR 292.203

Now that qualifying facilities have been explained, it’s time to move on to avoided costs. Avoided costs are the amount a utility company must pay a renewable energy generator for its energy. The cost is equal to the amount the utility would avoid by not producing the same amount of electricity but can be based on other negotiated rates. 

The avoided cost rules were updated with 2005’s Energy Policy Act, removing the mandatory purchasing rule for utilities in competitive wholesale markets for qualifying facilities larger than 20 MW. The rule remained unchanged for smaller electric power generators producing less than 20 MW, even in competitive markets.

Who Benefits from Avoided Costs? 

Avoided costs sound like something designed to handcuff utilities to renewable producers, but both operators benefit. 

Utilities avoid generating electricity when they don’t have to, leaving room for increased capacity when more power is needed. Purchasing electricity from companies using renewable sources like solar panels and wind turbines also helps offset pollution caused by traditional fossil fuels like coal, oil, or natural gas. 

Renewable energy producers benefit from avoided costs because they receive a guaranteed market to sell into. Because the utility must buy electricity from the renewable generating company, solar EPCs (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) can better manage costs associated with installing panels, interconnections, and everything else tied to coming online. 

Renewable companies also qualify for state and federal exemptions that help reduce operational friction. These include mandatory purchase agreements, interconnection guarantees, and other requirements like public utility regulation and taxation from states. The rules help get renewable projects off the ground more quickly and profitably so they can start supplying electricity to consumers.

Why PURPA Makes Sense for Solar 

Although PURPA supports all types of renewable power, solar energy producers have taken advantage of the law in several ways. 

Fair Competition – Consumers get lower costs for electricity based on available and affordable options. By requiring utilities to buy renewable power, consumers benefit from more energy diversity and can choose what power they want. 

Environmentally Friendly – PURPA has been instrumental in adding more than 100 GW of renewable electricity to the grid. The increase in renewable power has also lowered our dependence on domestic and foreign fossil fuels while bolstering clean energy. 

Better Financing – Several tax credits associated with PURPA make it easier and affordable for solar EPCs to establish energy projects. Investment Tax Credits (ITCs), Production Tax Credits (PTCs), and even property and sales tax exemptions are just a few credits installers enjoy. 

Rules also provide small solar sites with a safety net in the form of guaranteed energy purchasers and markets. 

PURPA Gets an Update 

The 1970s had its share of turbulence, and the U.S. economy was much different than it is today. 

When PURPA was signed into law, the country had just recovered from a severe oil crisis, and there were legitimate concerns about natural gas supplies. Today, we have vast natural gas stores and low-cost energy production methods. 

Unfortunately, the gas crisis of the 1970s has been replaced by climate concerns, and countries are pushing to become carbon neutral by 2050. The situation has forced the U.S. to reexamine what PURPA is trying to accomplish and rework the law to fit today’s changing needs. 

The law has been through several amendments, most recently in 2020. Order 872 has been controversial but modernized several parts of PURPA to fit today’s economic climate. Depending on who you ask, the changes aren’t all for the better, but the goal is to make things as fair as possible for solar installers, utilities, and end consumers.

Avoided Costs Get Adjusted 

In the early days of PURPA, utilities could be locked into long-term fixed energy rates that sometimes meant paying far more for electricity than it cost to produce. 

The new rule allows for more flexibility in pricing using multiple indexes and sources, making for a better, more accurate, and transparent pricing structure. Though the rule impacts costs, it doesn’t touch capacity rates, which control how much electricity is produced. Still, losing the long-term energy pricing contracts could make it harder for solar installers to finance projects. 

Order 872 also changed the criteria for locking in long-term contracts. Previously, projects could lock in using power purchase or other agreements. Now it is moving toward companies showing financial viability before finalizing contracts.

The One Mile Rule 

Under the old rule, capacity was capped at 80 MW for same-site facilities, including energy facilities of the same type found within a mile of a Qualifying Facility. 

The new rule is similar but adds a 10-mile rebuttal. Anything further than 10 miles from the QF is now considered a separate site. This means facilities with the same power source less than 10 miles from a QF can qualify as the same site, including them in the 80 MW capacity.

Competitive Market Access 

Under this rule, utilities can avoid power purchase agreements if the Qualifying Facilities can access competitive markets. 

The old rule established the threshold for QFs to sell to utilities for avoided costs at 20 MW but has been lowered to only 5 MW. One wrinkle in the rule is that the lower threshold applies to power production but not co-generation plants.

Potential Concerns 

Though PURPA’s amendments impact utilities and solar companies, the goal is a steady supply of clean energy from multiple sources at prices the average consumer can afford.  

The changes also have the unintended effect of altering the relationship between the two entities – sometimes not for the betterment of solar installers. Ditching fixed revenue streams may create problems for companies wanting to build but can’t rely on receiving a steady check. Variable revenues mean companies are tied to the market rather than standard avoided cost metrics. 

Lower mandatory purchasing size thresholds also mean less market certainty against more competition. If there’s too much risk, it could have a chilling effect on solar EPCs and other renewable builders.

PURPA Changes Are Mixed 

The new rules have been around for about 3 years, and we’ve seen a few trends developing. 

Solar Isn’t Slowing – It was feared at first that solar development would be shaken. If anything, the pace has increased, especially as the government pushes for renewable energy development. 

Consumers Are in Control – Today’s electricity customers benefit from lower costs and have more electricity options than ever, including emerging renewable sources like solar and wind. 

Utilities Made Some Gains – Utilities have the right to negotiate for variable avoided cost rates that don’t tie them to a potentially costly contract. They also have the power to define rates based on several indexes and economic factors. 

Time will tell how these changes shape the industry landscape, but overall, PURPA has been a boon for the solar industry. Even as conditions change, it’s only fair the rules guiding us adapt and grow alongside it, too.

How Do Solar Investment Tax Credit Adders Work?

When it comes to the government, there’s no such thing as a simple, straightforward solution. 

Unfortunately, for developers, financiers, and engineering, procurement, and construction companies, known as EPCs, that means knowing when, how, and where projects qualify for federal solar tax credits. Without them, it’s harder to complete jobs quickly and effectively. 

When the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was signed into law, it opened the door for a massive uptick in tax credits for solar. However, not everyone qualifies for all the tax credits, and plenty of intricate rules must be followed to receive them. 

Projects can qualify for ITC solar credits up to 60%, with adders tied to domestic materials and products, location, and low-income communities. 

But what projects qualify for federal funding? 

What is the Base ITC Credit? 

When the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law, it extended the shelf life of the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) for solar installations and increased its value. 

From now until 2032, solar credits for projects are 30% and apply to businesses and homeowners. After 2032, the credit decreases until it’s finally sunset. For utility-scale solar projects larger than 1MW, the tax credit is 6% but rises to 30% if several criteria are met.  

But what are the criteria, you ask? 

For starters, a project qualifies for the 30% credit if workers are paid prevailing wages. The project also requires a certain number of apprentices to perform the work. There are also rules for apprentice-to-journeyman worker ratios, as outlined by the Department of Labor. 

Accessing the 10% ITC Adder 

Qualifying for the 10% domestic production adder requires projects to satisfy three criteria

  • Must be in the United States or an associated territory  
  • Must use new or like new equipment (cannot exceed a certain threshold of used parts)  
  • Cannot be leased to a tax-except entity  

The first 10% Investment Tax Credit available is the domestic content adder. As the name implies, projects must use a certain percentage of U.S.-produced materials to qualify. In the case of steel and iron, 100% of those materials must be U.S.-made as outlined by American Iron and Steel (AIS) rules, meaning everything from sourcing to final finishing has to take place in the United States. 

With that said, the domestic content adder does not apply to subcomponents used for the project, including nuts, bolts, washers, etc. 

Meeting the Project Threshold 

As with any federal funding project, businesses must meet certain criteria before accessing the federal tax credit. 

For the 10% ITC adder, manufactured products must comprise at least 40% of the total project cost. Over time, the threshold will rise, meaning more domestic products are needed to receive funding. 

Offshore wind projects will follow a similar rising threshold schedule, but only 20% of the total cost-adjusted percentage needs to be tied to U.S. manufactured products for now. 

The percentages increase over time, as seen in the table below. 

Year Domestic Product Threshold – Solar Domestic Product Threshold – Offshore Wind 
Before 2025 40% 20% 
2025 45% 27.5% 
2026 50% 35% 
2027 55% 45% 

The threshold for offshore wind will eventually reach 55% after 2027 to match solar projects.

Of course, the rules aren’t as black-and-white as one would hope, and there are breakdowns for how products are classified as domestic or foreign-made. 

For example, only components mined or made in the U.S. count toward the total adjusted content rule. Let’s say you’re using a widget made with three components – two are domestically made, but the third was manufactured overseas. Although the widget was U.S.-made, you only get credit for the two domestically produced components. 

The cost of the foreign-made component would be subtracted from the total cost of the widget, leaving you with the cost of the U.S.-made parts. Whatever that percentage is counts toward the total cost. 

It’s a lot to manage, but the rule is simple: If a component, product, or material is made in the U.S., it counts! But besides the domestic manufacturing component associated with the adder, projects also need to meet one of several conditions, including: 

  • The project has an installed capacity of less than 1MW AC  
  • Construction began before Jan. 29, 2023  
  • It meets prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements  

Projects meeting one of these conditions are eligible for the 10% credit. 

Concerns About the Threshold 

One common concern from solar EPCs is the difficulty of hitting the domestic product threshold due to a lack of U.S.-based manufacturers for solar products. 

Solar companies have had trouble getting ahold of critical solar power system parts, including solar panels, inverters, BOS components, and racking materials. As the threshold rises, some installers fear the 10% ITC will be too difficult to reach. 

In 2022, the government issued a moratorium on solar tariffs, opening the door for cheaper panels and parts from Asian countries. Though it brings an influx of cheap parts to help installers catch up on delayed projects, they also jeopardize the chances of their solar energy system receiving the renewable energy tax credit. 

Ramping Up Domestic Production 

The moratorium was offered, in part, to keep solar projects moving while domestic manufacturers got up to speed.  

While increased federal support is a boon for companies trying to take market share from foreign competitors, the investment is a long-term strategy that leaves current problems unsolved. 

First Solar is the major solar panel producer in the U.S., but the company does not have the size to meet current demand. Other solar manufacturers include, but are not limited to, Heliene, Mission Solar, JinkoSolar, SunPower, Silfab Solar, and Hanwha Qcells, which all produce different parts of the BOS, but have also struggled to meet U.S. demand in recent years. 

However, several brands, including Qcells, have announced expansion plans in the coming years to support increased demand. For example, Qcells’ expansion in Georgia will add 2,500 jobs and double production at the facility by 2024. 

Other Available Solar Project Credits 

It might seem too good to be true, but the 30% ITC credit can rise as high as 60% in certain situations. 

Energy Community Bonus 

Solar projects can earn an additional 10% credit for building in a former energy community. What’s an energy community? It’s a location that is either a former brownfield site or a facility where coal, oil, or natural gas are mined or converted into energy. 

If the site isn’t a brownfield, the project could still qualify if it satisfies one of several other criteria, including: 

  • Either .17% direct employment OR at least 25% of local tax revenue from coal, oil, or natural gas production or storage AND an unemployment rate higher than the national average 
  • Housed a coal mine that closed after 1999 OR a coal electric plant retired after 2009 

Although many parts of the country qualify under at least one of these conditions, some sections don’t, including much of the Midwest. 

Keep in mind that energy communities should NOT be confused with low-income areas. 

Low-Income Bonus 

This 10% credit is awarded to solar projects that sell electricity to lower-income areas and is for solar installations smaller than 5MW. 

What’s interesting about this clean energy adder is that it has two tiers. Projects receive a 10% ITC if they’re located in a low-income community or on Native American land. If the installation is a qualified low-income residential building project, which, according to the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, requires “financial benefits of the solar facility must be allocated equitably between the residents,” it receives a 20% ITC. 

The Credits Are Complicated, But They Have to Be 

When the government gets involved, it typically comes with heaps of regulatory red tape, but the complexity of this program is vital for a few reasons. 

Tying an ITC or PTC to the program encourages solar companies to buy American-made products, bolstering the economy and decreasing reliance on foreign-made goods like solar panels, racking, and PV wire. 

Programs like this also help with nearshoring and reshoring manufacturing efforts. When domestic goods are prioritized, installers benefit from lower shipping costs, including tariffs and duties, since the material has a shorter shipping distance. 

With higher demand, companies can hire and support additional jobs in emerging industries. These careers often pay well and offer room for advancement, making it possible to make a living in a burgeoning market. It’s also important to consider where the jobs are going. Establishing companies and projects in economically depressed areas and locations where fossil fuel plants once stood keeps jobs in those communities and even adds new ones. 

Credits Keep Solar Moving 

The U.S. is moving toward a sustainable future, but can solar tax credits work? 

Solar is surging in the United States, not just because it produces low-cost energy for communities alongside hundreds of thousands of jobs. Installations can stabilize the electrical grid using new technology, keeping the lights on in homes. As the technology improves, solar could be a low-cost alternative to fossil fuels, reliably producing clean, renewable energy. 

Renewable energy still has a long way to go to become the primary power source for the U.S., but a monumental shift is possible with a clear focus on solutions.

Factory vs. Field-Made: Comparing Solar Connectors

Utility-scale solar installations have a lot of fragile parts and pieces. Small issues can result in thousands of dollars’ worth of lost energy, system damage, or even a fire. 

According to HelioVolta’s SolarGrade PV Health Report, nearly 60% of solar installation issues were attributed to field-made connectors or wire management. Field-made connector issues alone attributed to one-third of all problems at solar sites. Within that segment, the percentage of critical and major issues attributed to field-made connectors was higher than any other damage type. 

It’s fair to say connectors are a concern, but it helps to know when and how the connectors were made. Field-made connectors are installed on-site by workers, compared to factory-made ones attached to PV wire during production.  

With that in mind, the blame then falls on either the connector or the worker who assembled it. 

With so much money and energy on the line, companies must reduce liability and increase their installations’ reliability. Could factory-made connectors improve overall production and dependability? 

The Difference Between Field and Factory-Made Solar Connectors 

Companies have two options for connectors for a utility-scale solar power array: factory-made connectors or field-made solar connectors. 

Factory-made connectors are installed onto the wire in a controlled environment. Performing the work in a manufacturing facility makes it easier to spot quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) issues so bad connectors aren’t sent out to the field. 

When PV wire connectors are made in the field, they’re assembled by solar installers. Typically, field-made connectors are used to ensure connectors aren’t cross-mated with other “compatible” parts. During this process, workers use certified pieces and tools supplied by a manufacturer and then do the work themselves. The important thing to remember here is that both the parts and the tools are certified, meaning installers should only use what was supplied to them by the manufacturer. 

Although several connector types exist on the market, some are more common than others. MC4 connectors, using a plug-and-socket method, are the current standard, and Swiss manufacturer Staubli is the original developer and manufacturer. Since the MC4’s inception, many other companies have started making their own compatible connectors, leading to a growing number of connector manufacturers and parts to choose from. 
 
The problem is although there is a certification process for the connectors, cross-mated parts aren’t usually tested together as a single unit. 

One Size Doesn’t Fit All 

There are several types of connectors used in solar operations, including the MC4, MC3 (phased out by MC4), and Amphenol Helios models, but you can’t always use one with another. 

While it might not seem like a big deal mixing and matching connectors across a solar site, HelioVolta noted in its SolarGrade report that pieces were either improperly installed or cross-mated in nearly 80% of field-made connector issues. 

As installers rush to catch up with delayed projects and set up new sites, the resulting time crunch opens the door for mistakes. The industry is also growing, leading to an influx of junior installers who may not have enough experience to perform the job well. 

What Does This Mean for Solar Sites? 

Connector issues set the stage for several problems. From water and moisture exposure, bad PV connector points, and damaged wires from bad crimps or other mistakes, every issue could open the door to a costly disaster

So, what happens when a PV system has connector issues? Quite a lot, actually: 

  • Lost power and outages – When connectors fail, the solar panel is no longer reliably connected to the Balance of System (BOS). When that happens, the system produces less energy. 
  • Ground faults or arcing – Ground faults and arcs occur when there isn’t good contact in the connector. Heat expands the parts over time, opening gaps and eventually creating an arc that can damage surrounding wires and materials. 
  • Fires – When fires break out, they can quickly cause millions of dollars in damage. Once the fire is out, crews need to replace damaged and charred parts, adding sunk time and labor costs to the total bill. 

Not every field-made connector is an inherent fire risk, but they may carry more risk than factory-made parts, according to HelioVolta’s data. 

Avoiding Connector Issues 

Limiting the number of fail points is critical when dealing with large utility-scale installations. 

Buying factory-made connectors addresses a crucial failure point, setting your solar energy project up for better long-term success. 

According to the SolarGrade PV Health Report, only 6% of issues at solar arrays were tied to factory-made connectors, much less than the 33% associated with their field-made counterparts. Manufacturer-made parts also reduce on-site critical and major problems, thanks to each manufacturer’s rigorous QC and QA programs. 

The Best Connector for the Wire 

Another benefit of factory-made connectors is that manufacturers can use compatible products with their wire and cable. The result is a more reliable connection, thanks to a standardized process retaining integrity across the board. 
 
Installers may rush or get stretched thin, limiting their attention, resulting in potentially loose or poor connections. Furthermore, unlike field-made connectors that may lack QA assurance from another worker in the field, most manufacturers have staff on hand to spot potential concerns before the wire leaves the factory. 

What Do Bad Connectors Look Like? 

No matter what type of connector is used, you should know what damage looks like. 

We recommend having crews inspect solar sites once every 6 months or so and check every connection point for common problems, including: 

  • Gaps 
  • Cross-threading 
  • Sun Damage 
  • Overheating 
  • Other connector or wire damage 

One of the easiest mistakes to make is using incompatible connectors. When connectors are cross-mated without checking for compatibility, it can put the solar installation at risk. Mismatched connections can generate a lot of heat, making them easy to spot with a temperature gauge. 

It’s also important to ensure every installer is trained to properly work on solar panels, cabling and other balance of system (BOS) pieces. 

Know What You’re Getting 

Simply put – buying factory-made connectors reduces risk. 

Manufacturers have strict quality control standards to prevent damaged or improperly assembled connectors from being shipped out to the field in the first place. If bad parts do get shipped, they can also work alongside customers to quickly correct mistakes before dangerous situations develop. 

Not all field-made connectors will have issues, and many will be fine. But when the goal is to limit risk and liability on your renewable energy project, factory-made connectors are the way to go.

Avoiding Connector Issues on Utility-Scale Solar Sites

Installation costs, labor, and product reliability often go together when bringing utility-scale solar projects online. 

Despite declining hard and soft costs, there is still pressure to deliver projects on time and under budget. This means installers look for every way to save time and money. 

Material and labor costs usually provide some savings, but the solutions aren’t always elegant. One issue creeping into the solar conversation is the reliability of PV wire connectors and harnesses that cut down on labor but increase the number of fail points in the balance of system (BOS). 

When crews use harnesses, it means more connectors to bring wires together. More connections generally mean more opportunities for issues. Whether it’s installation related, tied to the weather, or just a random event, solar panels can’t do their job if connectors break. 

By limiting the number of PV cable connectors, installers reduce the number of fail points and increase reliability. 

Why Companies Use Connectors 

Every solar project will require MC4 connectors, but the number needed depends on how the installer approaches the problem. 

When companies use Sun-Pull bundled PV wire, it’s a 1:1 connection. This means one wire, one string, and one connector from the solar panel to the combiner box. Although the bundle has individual #10 AWG conductors, they can be terminated at different points along the run. As a result, workers only have to move down the line once. 

If a company decides to increase the number of connectors used, it would need about half the amount of wire compared to a bundled cable solution. They could also use a larger gauge wire (in this case, #8 AWG) than the #10 AWG used in the bundled wire, reducing electricity lost from the solar panel to the combiner box. 

Using connectors across the solar array sounds like a slam dunk, but several drawbacks complicate matters. 

No Real Cost Savings 

Although the installer needs about half the wire, the larger gauge wire eats into the cost savings. Not to mention, the project now requires harnesses and additional connectors to complete the job. All told, the savings are nearly negligible. 

The company might find labor cost savings, which are reduced since workers are installing less wire. Using more connectors saves labor hours, but crews still need to take multiple trips down the line. 

“It’s a less elegant method,” Sun-Pull Wire President Nick Eberly explained. “It will cut your labor in half, you only have to go down that row half the number of times because you’re installing a harness, but you’re installing double the number of connectors. You’re also still going down the row multiple times, compared to a bundled wire which requires going down the line once.” 

More Connections, More Failure Points 

It might not seem like a big deal, but too many connectors can cripple solar installations. 

If you’ve ever left something plastic outside, you’ve likely seen firsthand what the elements do to it over time. The same can be said about the plastic housing connectors have that protect the pins and sockets inside. 

When joining PV panels to the combiner box, the plastic connector pieces are exposed to the elements, eventually degrading them. Although they’re sunlight resistant, they’re still vulnerable to excess moisture, snow, and other environmental factors. If water sneaks into the connector, it can create a short. 

“If you have a piece of wire that’s insulated, that can stay outside for a really long time in the elements,” Eberly explained. “Wherever you put that connector, that’s generally going to fail quicker than the wire itself. And every time one of those connectors blows, a fuse blows too. That lowers the output, and then you have to fix that.” 

Eberly suggests a single conductor approach that eliminates as many connectors as possible. In this scenario, a wire runs from the solar panel to the combiner box, keeping sensitive pieces safe while limiting exposure. 

It’s Not Always the Connector’s Fault 

Sometimes connectors fail through no fault of their own – they get a little help from some unlikely sources. 

The products widely used today are called MC4 connectors and were developed by Staubli, a Swiss manufacturer. Although the company owns about one-third of the product’s global market share, hundreds of global connector manufacturers exist, mostly in Asia. Unfortunately, there isn’t a universal standard, meaning manufacturers can produce similar products with subtle differences that could impact performance. 

Beyond manufacturing, installers may cause connector failures. From putting connectors on backward and not crimping them hard enough to crimping the surrounding wire insulation, cross-threading, or under/over-torquing them, problems can occur. 

As a result, issues could range from a loss of electrical output and performance to full-blown fires. 

According to a 2019 Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems report, many connector failures found on utility-scale solar arrays happen within the first five years. Additionally, a joint study by PVEL and HelioVolta found connector issues in more than 70% of commercial and industrial projects analyzed by HelioVolta. 

With so many variations on the market, it’s difficult to ensure quality, leading to potential delays and setbacks. And when harnesses are used, connector failures often mean the whole harness needs to be replaced. 

Small Parts, Huge Impact 

Connectors may not seem like a big deal, but there’s a cascading effect whenever one fails. 

Let’s say a connector fails at a large solar project. The system loses output because of the damaged connector, and the piece could create a situation where arcs, sparks, or fire occur. 

When that happens, the utility or company has to pay labor costs for workers to go out and fix the damage and material costs for a new connector, PV wire, and other BOS parts. The company also loses money because the system isn’t generating as much power, leading to lower profits and potentially unhappy customers. 

This isn’t to say every connector failure will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to repair. But when multiple connectors fail on a large site, several tiny problems can become a giant headache. 

One (String) and Done 

There isn’t one way to wire a utility-scale solar power site, but it’s possible to save time, labor, and money by finding a system that works well for you. 

Bundled PV wire is a simple solution that reduces fail points from the solar panels to the combiner box and lets workers travel each row once. There’s also no need for harnesses or multiple connection points to connect wires. It’s a safer, more reliable system with less risk of failures, such as electrical arcing or dangerous contact with DC electricity. 

Like other types of renewable energy, solar is on the rise. Of course, work must be done to fully standardize the process, but the necessary steps are taking place. According to PVEL, the NEC was revised in 2020 to require connector pairs to be tested and certified for intermateability. It’s one small step toward a universal process in the United States. 

Connectors are only one piece of a solar BOS, but they’re a potential weak point. Finding solutions that need fewer parts and are more reliable makes it easier to save money on future projects and speeds up the nation’s move away from fossil fuels.

What Happens If the U.S. Reinstates Solar Panel Tariffs?

For the most part, this has been a good year for the solar industry. 

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) supercharged the industry, creating billions of dollars in investments. It also led to announcements of more than two dozen solar manufacturing facilities and 10 utility-scale battery storage manufacturing plants across the United States. 

The IRA isn’t the only thing adding fuel to the solar industry’s fire. Growth can also be attributed to the Biden administration’s 24-month moratorium on solar panels coming from four Asian counties. The move allows Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam to sell low-cost solar panels to U.S. companies and gives stateside producers time to ramp up production. 

A Bumpy Road 

While everything seems fine on the surface, solar installers face rising uncertainty from Congress. A bipartisan effort to reinstate the tariffs has moved through the House and Senate but was vetoed by Biden in mid-May

According to lawmakers, overturning the moratorium would be a rebuke of the Chinese government, spurring domestic production and investment. The problem is that reinstating the tariffs would potentially derail solar installations and investments without guaranteeing U.S. manufacturers can fill the void. 

What does reinstating tariffs mean for the rapidly expanding solar industry? Based on earlier experience, there are several things we can expect. 

Market Uncertainty 

When something changes in the market, everyone has to adjust. 

From a supply chain standpoint, reducing the flow of low-cost solar panels from Asia can delay projects. It also forces manufacturers to source materials elsewhere or jumpstart domestic production to keep shipping panels. 

Meanwhile, distributors must scramble to get the products they need for installers, who, in turn, struggle with having the right amount of labor available. The labor aspect is especially important. According to Abigail Ross Hopper with the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), Congress’ move to overturn the moratorium could affect up to 30,000 jobs. 

Since the tariff decision was made last year, there has been a drastic increase in solar projects across the country. During COVID, supply chain issues created delays for many projects. With a wave of new panels, those installations have picked up again. It’s also encouraged other companies to make announcements for upcoming solar projects. 

The problem is reinstating the tariff. In a burgeoning industry like solar, market uncertainty can halt new investments. When companies can’t plan or forecast, they struggle to find the budget to complete projects. Then, they get delayed or shelved until market conditions improve. 

Strained Geopolitical Relationships 

One of the main reasons the solar panel tariff was introduced was due to an ongoing trade war with China. 

On several occasions, the U.S. has accused China of “dumping” materials into the American market, creating conditions that make it hard for domestic producers to compete. Dumping, as the name implies, occurs when a country sells raw materials, products, or other goods in another market at a low price, sometimes less than the cost to produce it. 

When dumping occurs, domestic producers are forced to sell their products at a higher price and potentially lose market share or lower prices to compete. In either case, it can hurt competition in the buying country’s market and disrupt the economy. 

U.S. officials believe China is going through Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam to skirt anti-dumping regulations and get solar panels into the U.S. market. Reinstating the solar panel tariff may not directly impact China, but could cause a rippling effect, further hurting the relationship between the two superpowers. 

There is one positive aspect to this situation, though. With tariffs on solar panel imports, domestic producers will have room to ramp up production to meet clean energy demand. 

Higher Short-Term Pricing 

When there’s less product to go around, prices naturally rise. 

Shortly after President Biden suspended solar panel tariffs, companies jumped at the opportunity to buy low-cost panels from overseas. Prices dropped because there was enough supply to meet growing demand in the U.S. Unfortunately, that would change if tariffs were reinstated. 

Think of it this way: eggs are typically cheap and don’t often fluctuate in price because demand is generally constant, as is supply. But earlier this year, prices skyrocketed after avian flu reduced the number of eggs produced while demand was unchanged. As egg producers fought to catch up, the cost of eggs exploded by double digits, with people sometimes paying $5 or more per dozen. Today, prices are slightly higher than last year, but we’re nearly back to equilibrium. 

So, let’s use the same supply and demand lens on the solar panel situation. What would happen if the steady supply of low-cost panels became severely restricted? In the short term, prices would spike as supplies dwindled and demand stayed high. Prices will jump if domestic producers and manufacturers in other countries don’t fill the immediate void. 

Once manufacturers in the U.S. increase their output, costs will come down until reaching an equilibrium price. 

More Domestic Investment 

Although having an influx of solar panels is great for the burgeoning solar industry, Congress has a good reason for reinstating the tariffs; legislators want to see domestic producers in control. 

For all intents and purposes, the White House has promoted green energy economic development across the board, not just solar. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has been a boon for solar and other renewables, resulting in $150 billion in capital investments across many clean energy projects. 

It’s about more than simply making more panels and parts, though. Every investment in renewable development in the U.S. is an opportunity to create thousands of high-paying jobs in an expanding industry. Without a steady stream of utility-scale solar products, companies can’t predict labor needs. 

More production also gives the U.S. a chance to meet its high-level sustainability goals. According to the White House, the U.S. wants to reach 80% renewable energy generation by 2030 and 100% carbon-free electricity by 2035. They’re lofty goals, especially when nearly 80% of our energy was generated by fossil fuels in 2021. 

With more investment in renewable energy, there is a chance to turn the tide. According to the EIA (Energy Information Administration), total solar generation share could double from 3% in 2022 to 6% by 2024, thanks to lower production and installation costs combined with tax credits and other incentives. 

Where Do We Go from Here? 

No matter what happens with the tariffs, it’s important to remember the moratorium was only temporary. 

The stay was meant to give solar installers, companies, and utilities time to complete projects, increase production, and build a thriving U.S. solar market. Two years may not cover a manufacturer’s ramp-up timeline, but it gives installers time to work on projects while they get up to speed. 

It’s also worth noting that although tariff relief supports low-cost solar panels, the IRA has been doing the heavy lifting to create investment and manufacturing opportunities for companies. 

Repealing tariff relief on solar panels now may be a minor setback, but it shouldn’t cloud our view of what has been done so far. American manufacturing is growing, with companies like Sun-Pull producing critical infrastructure like bundled PV wire. Other companies are coming online soon, joining manufacturers who have found footing in the space, making panels and Balance of System (BOS) items. 

Renewable energy, including solar, is the future, but how we approach the coming years depends on our commitment to green energy and divesting from fossil fuels.  

Anything is possible, but we need to move quickly.

Production, Labor, and Land: The Push for Solar Energy

You’ve probably seen renewable energy, including solar, receiving large-scale investments lately. 

It’s no surprise the solar industry is growing, especially given the world’s push to curb climate change. The U.S. solar market currently totals $35 billion and generates about 5% of our country’s electricity – nearly 11 times more than a decade ago. The trend is expected to continue, thanks to recent actions from the Biden administration, including the recently passed Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). 

The government’s actions are spurring excitement in the industry. Solar manufacturers are announcing large-scale production investments, including Qcells, Enel, Maxeon, and CubicPV. These projects are expected to increase domestic solar production more than five times, expanding from 7GW to more than 42GW. 

Though the IRA encourages companies to invest in renewable energy, the changing geopolitical climate plays a vital role. In 2022, a 24-month tariff moratorium was announced for solar panels coming into the U.S. from four Asian countries, including Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam. The stay allows U.S. companies to import low-cost solar panels from Asia while giving domestic manufacturers time to increase production. 

The utility-scale solar growth has been nice, but there are still barriers to success, including: 

  • Reliance on imports 
  • Permitting and regulatory red tape 
  • Ongoing labor issues 
  • Public skepticism of solar power 

Combatting these issues may supercharge the clean energy industry and allow for more utility-scale solar power domestically. 

Fewer Imports, Better Results 

China is a key player in the solar energy industry. Not only does it produce a large number of low-cost solar panels, but it’s also a leader in energy storage. 

Although China’s solar panels are inexpensive, they come at a cost. There are questions about the country’s skirting of duties applied to them, and their low cost has made it difficult for domestic manufacturers to compete. 

COVID also showed us that supply chains can be easily disrupted, making getting supplies quickly or reliably harder. 

Recent developments like the IRA may reduce U.S. reliance on other countries. Contrary to what that sounds like, it doesn’t mean the U.S. is cutting China or any other country out. We’re simply narrowing the supply chain and bringing more production stateside. 

Since the IRA became law, innovative companies have jumped in to support solar expansion, committing to producing everything from modules and inverters to batteries, copper foil, and photovoltaic (PV) wire. Even structural products like racking and trackers are showing signs of increased production as manufacturers take advantage of the changing business climate

Unfortunately, we can’t flip a switch and immediately start production. It can take months, even years, for production facilities to come online. However, the hope is that with enough lead time to get production moving, the U.S. can become competitive in the solar space. 

Streamlining the Permitting Process 

Let’s be honest; the government is a lot of things, but fast isn’t usually one of them. Despite the Biden administration helping installers get low-cost panels and freeing up billions of dollars to promote renewables, there’s more to do. 

The permitting process is different depending on where the installers are. Even the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has called the permitting process a “patchwork” of regulations varying from state to state. 

To make the process smoother, the EPA introduced a toolkit to help developers, utilities, and communities navigate regulations, secure financing, and troubleshoot issues. But organizations like the SEIA are calling for more permit reform. In their eyes, reducing red tape adds jet fuel to a burgeoning industry, opening the door for more jobs, revenue, and opportunity. 

Although there have been attempts to streamline the building process for companies to set up distributed energy systems, none have succeeded. For example, the bipartisan American Energy Opportunity Act of 2019 bill called on the Department of Energy (DOE) to designate a board to help qualify communities with solar systems and certify installers in the space. It died without a vote or any other action. 

Establishing Better Career Promotion and Labor Relations 

As with any growing industry, thousands of skilled and unskilled jobs are available. The problem is finding enough people to meet increasing needs. 

Unskilled labor is in high demand, but so is the need for electrical, process, and chemical engineers, scientists, architects, physicists, planners, and more. The jobs are certainly available, more so with the increased focus. 

More than 250,000 people work in the solar industry, with job growth in 47 of 50 U.S. states. Among them, California, Texas, New York, and Florida are at the forefront of hiring and employment. Even states traditionally tied to fossil fuels are beginning to lean into solar. 

The labor shortage doesn’t have to cripple solar. If private companies, utilities, colleges, and governments collaborate, it simplifies recruiting efforts and builds industry interest early on. Training programs, apprenticeships, and veterans programs are only a few ways to introduce new workers to renewable energy occupations. 

Creating Positive Perceptions 

For some people, solar is the future of electrical energy and a way to rely less on fossil fuels. Others see PV panels as another way to muck up a hillside view. 

Solar has plenty going for it, but it also has its fair share of detractors. Often helmed by rural mobilization efforts, arguments range from deforestation fears and aesthetic issues for homeowners to agricultural concerns. The truth is that solar installations aren’t nearly the nuisance people think they are. 

Think about the last time you looked at a swamp and thought, “Wow, what a great place to build!” Solar sites aren’t typically found where other development is attractive or possible.  

Swamps, steep hillsides, and farmland are great locations for utility-scale solar installations because they don’t interfere much with our daily lives. For example, one Sun-Pull solar installation is tucked in behind a correctional facility. Another is in what used to be an unused swamp area off a busy road. 

In the case of farmland, agrivoltaics is literally changing the solar landscape. Recent studies have shown that combining solar panels with grazing areas or cropland can benefit both the land and the panels. Unlike other solar installations, which only serve one application, agrivoltaics let property owners use the land while leasing it out. 

What’s important to remember is that education breeds awareness, especially in communities where solar is a practical solution. Better access to tools and information can alleviate concerns and encourage residents to learn more about community and utility-scale solar. 

Solar Goes Mainstream 

This is an exciting time to be in the solar industry, but there’s still more to do. 

The industry needs continued investment from private and public sources. An influx of money will spur production, job growth, and energy reliability as the world turns more toward renewables. 

Solar manufacturing and installation jobs pay well, have job security, and can help revolutionize the electrical utility industry. More workers also push innovation, better designs, and increased interest in revamping the electrical grid. 

Solar power is the future of energy. As installed capacities increase and technology improves, getting much of our energy from the sun, wind, and water will become commonplace. But it’s not all about getting away from fossil fuels; this is a move toward unlimited sustainable, clean energy. 

The renewable revolution is here. With a sustained effort, the U.S. is more than capable of reaching its lofty energy production goals.

5 Solar Trends We’re Watching in 2022 and 2023

The solar industry is growing by leaps and bounds, leaving many to wonder what the next phase of growth might look like and when it could arrive. 

President Joe Biden has expressed the need for more renewable energy to meet the country’s ambitious environmental plans. The ultimate goal is to move to a completely decarbonized energy sector by 2050, but the United States will need a massive boost from its sustainable energy producers like wind, hydro, and solar power. 

So what exactly does the future look like for solar? We’ve highlighted the five biggest solar power trends we think will influence the rest of this year and into 2023, and it’s a mixed bag. Some of what we’re seeing is incredibly encouraging, while other aspects give us some reason for short-term concern. 

From the supply chain to overseas tariffs, these are the five biggest trends we’re watching this year. 

The Supply Chain is Dictating Solar Costs 

Unfortunately, the world has not recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic nearly as quickly as we had hoped for. 

China’s on-again-off-again lockdowns have caused starts and stops in many manufacturing supply chains, resulting in lower availability of goods. Labor issues in the U.S. mean there aren’t enough dock workers and truck drivers to move raw and finished materials from ports, creating additional supply chain bottlenecks. 

The lack of manufacturing production combined with less labor means that are fewer products available, leaving companies and utilities scrambling to source everything from solar panels and batteries to copper wire. These unintended shortages and delays have put the brakes on some utility solar projects, with some utility scale solar projects facing delays ranging from a couple months to next year. 

According to the SEIA, solar prices were up 18% in 2021, though the spike can’t solely be attributed to a shaky supply chain (more on this topic later). The organization went on to say that about one-third of 2021’s Q4 capacity was delayed by a quarter, while about 13% of capacity slated for this year has been pushed back at least a year, or cancelled entirely. 

The supply chain’s struggles are now becoming the entire industry’s problems. Short-term solar forecasts are down by nearly 20%, and reports suggest the industry could grow about 25% less than expected this year. 

It’s not all bad news. Even with the pandemic, utility scale solar power costs dropped going into 2021, falling by about 12%. Short-term spikes in the cost of materials, including those used to make the panels, threaten to erase those cost savings, though relief seems to be on the way from the Biden administration. 

The Solar Industry Is Dealing with Tariffs Galore 

For several years, China has found itself the subject of anti-dumping regulations from the U.S. Simply put, dumping is what happens when a company offloads its product in another country for much cheaper than they would in their home country. According to the U.S., companies in China has been selling their solar technologies at a very low cost, making it harder for companies domestically to compete. 

To fix the issue, the U.S. assigned tariffs to Chinese and Taiwanese solar panels in 2014, increasing prices by 50%. Chinese companies, though, may have used a loophole to avoid tariffs and still get their products into the U.S. by establishing companies in other countries like Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Cambodia and sending products to the U.S. tariff-free. 

Today, more than 80% of the most popular solar modules come from those four countries. That means most of the panels used on utility sites in the U.S. are primarily coming from Asia, and most likely from a China-based company. In 2018, then President Trump instituted tariffs to increase the cost of manufactured products coming in from those countries. 

Most recently, the U.S. Department of Commerce began looking into solar cell imports from Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Cambodia to assess whether dumping had occurred, but in early June, President Biden issued an announcement that it wouldn’t impose new tariffs on solar imports for two years. The move is expected to help get utility solar projects across the country back on track as soon as possible. 

Long-term Solar Costs Will Decrease 

Solar is already among the cheapest energy producers available today, but as production costs continue to drop and panel prices become cheaper and more efficient, it could open up more avenues to expand solar systems across the country. 

As recently as 2020, electricity produced by utility-scale solar cost about 5 cents per kWh. The cost dropped to 3.5 cents per kWh in the most optimized regions. The hope is that solar panels become more efficient, while the costs of modules and BOS systems keep dropping. 

So far the trend has held up. From 2010-2020, the cost of a utility PV solar system dropped by more than 80%. Despite a short-term increase in prices due to the pandemic, supply chain issues, and tariff concerns, overall trends show on-site project costs continuing to fall as more efficiencies are found. 

For its part, Sun-Pull Wire is continuously working to revolutionize how PV wire is installed on utility scale systems. Sun-Pull’s cable solution, for example, cuts down on overall labor costs and project time by allowing a team of 3 to 4 people to install 1mW of string PV wire per day. Compared to single wire pulls, Sun-Pull’s PV wire can cut installation times by nearly 80%. 

Faster installation times means more work gets done faster, increasing overall productivity of on-site teams, which helps companies address labor shortages or take on more projects with the labor they have. 

Labor Shortages Are a Threat 

Like many industries, solar energy is also facing a worker shortage. 

Projections for the solar industry are positive, with estimates suggesting 1.5 million people could be employed by 2035, but in 2020 the industry only clocked about 231,000 workers – less than before the pandemic. To meet the Biden administration’s aggressive clean energy goals, it’s estimated that solar companies will need to employ about 900,000 workers. 

With that said, productivity was still up and the hope is that the industry will continue its rapid ascent as more companies come online. As more projects are completed and adding power to the grid, SEIA believes annual growth will stay strong, but is somewhat dependent on the supply chain. Despite a shaky supply chain, the group says there is a lot of demand for solar and it will remain popular in the coming years. 

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) agrees. As the country moves away from traditional fossil fuels for energy, the agency says solar, wind, and other renewables will need to step up to fill the gap. 

The industry is also moving quickly to meet anticipated demand. Companies like Sun-Pull are solar innovators, finding ways to create cost savings for solar workers and energy providers. Sun-Pull’s bundled cable solutions allow even inexperienced workers to move more quickly and install PV wire to panels much faster than traditional single-pull methods. 

Faster set-ups mean fewer people are needed on the job site, saving time, money, and manpower along the course of each utility-scale PV wire project. 

Better PV Modules and Outputs Are Coming 

In 2021, utility-scale solar produced nearly 114 million kWh, reflecting nearly 30% growth over the previous year. We expect outputs to keep increasing as more projects are added to the grid. 

This coincides with other advancements in solar technology meant to increase energy production and efficiency. So far, the highest efficiency a solar panel has recorded is 47%, though most solar panels on the market today hover in the 20s. However, multijunction solar cells tend to perform better than other types. 

Increasing efficiency is an important aspect of reaching our energy goals and there are several ways to make it happen. This can be done in a few different ways: 

  • Better thermal management – This will help solar panels perform better in colder environments. 
  • Minimize reflection – This requires non-reflective colors and coatings or using a textured surface to keep prevent solar rays from bouncing. More captured light means more efficiency. 
  • Reducing recombination – Recombination occurs when electrons return to their regular valence band. Companies can reduce recombination by cutting down panel impurities and other defects. 

Where Does Solar Go from Here? 

The goal is for solar energy to eventually replace traditional power plants. While it’s certainly within reach, the industry has some catching up to do. 

Solar PV energy is here to stay. Like wind, the Sun is an ultimately renewable resource that has the potential to create an incredible amount of electricity, especially in areas where the sun shines consistently. It also stands to benefit from continued enhancements, making panels and systems more reliable, efficient, and longer lasting. 

Recent actions, including a moratorium on new tariffs, will go a long way toward making life a bit easier for solar companies. With fewer roadblocks and a slowly improving supply chain, the entire solar industry is poised for massive growth in the coming years. 

We’re excited for the future and can’t wait to be a part of the solar revolution!

Is the U.S. Ready for 100% Renewable Energy?

Renewable energy has grown by leaps and bounds in recent years. But is the U.S. fully prepared to move forward with a 100% clean energy program? 

In 2021, renewable energy produced about 20% of all utility-scale electricity in the U.S., but only about 2.8% (115B kWh) was supplied by utility-scale solar energy operations, not including the additional 49B kWh generated by smaller-scale solar operations. The number may seem small, but it’s been growing annually and gives people hope that a fully green grid may be possible. 

Two things are clear if you’ve followed the news over the past several years. Fossil fuels won’t be the answer forever, and renewables still have a couple hurdles to jump to pick up the slack. 

The U.S. has some pretty ambitious energy goals, and the Biden administration has hinted that it would like to take steps to move away from traditional fossil fuels. This includes an ambitious proposed plan to reach 100% clean electricity by 2035

Though some experts believe it’s possible to hit the goal in short order, more than 60% of our energy is dependent on fossil fuels. It will take more effort, investment, and support to achieve. 

Is the U.S. Ready to Take the Next Step? 

At first glance, it might sound like a loaded question – but the answer may be yes. 

Several high-level studies, including one by Stanford in 2015, believe the United States can ultimately run on renewable energy… just not by 2035. They peg the year at a more realistic and gradual 2050. Though the study has been questioned, inspiration can be taken from it and its methodology. 

This isn’t to say progress isn’t being made in certain states and regions toward a fully renewable future. Rhode Island recently signed legislation into law committing to 100% renewable energy by 2033. The move puts the tiny state at the forefront of the renewable revolution, and it could be the first in the nation to go fully renewable. 

Earlier this year, California also made headlines when the state was powered only by renewable energy. The conditions were perfect, allowing California to produce more energy than it needed using only renewable power. 

The Golden State has proven that renewable, carbon-free, and sustainable energy sources can replace traditional power generation methods like coal and natural gas. In 2019, about two-thirds of the state’s power came from renewable energy systems like wind, solar, hydro, and nuclear. According to one energy manager with the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), investing heavily in solar and wind technologies will get us the bulk of the way, up to 90 percent, toward our clean energy goals. 

Why It’s So Hard to Quit Fossil Fuels 

If renewables are the future and everyone is scrambling to become the first to be rid of fossil fuels, how come we can’t seem to make it happen more quickly? 

The problem is that despite all of the pollution and the trouble we go through to use fossil fuels, they’re energy-dense and efficient forms of energy production. This means they produce energy at a higher rate than other forms of energy, including wood and biomass. 

Although oil isn’t typically used for electricity production, natural gas and coal are high-energy generators. They can pick up the slack on days the wind doesn’t blow and clouds block the sun’s rays from hitting solar panels. 

Even on that record-breaking day when California produced all of its electrical needs using renewable energy, fossil fuels were working behind the scenes. Fossil fuel power plants take hours to come online, so it’s easier to keep them running than risk not having enough power during peak use hours. 

How Do We Make the Move to 100% Renewable Energy? 

The easiest way to increase the adoption of renewable energy is to continue investing in it. 

This means investing in more green technology, including increasingly efficient solar panels, better wind turbines, and innovative batteries that can store generated electricity for longer. Part of the equation to reach a fully renewable future involves “overbuilding” the electrical grid, meaning we build enough infrastructure to supply more energy than we need. 

Some projections spot the number at about 2.5 times the total energy demand to ensure we cover all the bases. That growth means utilities and companies must invest in solar and wind energy, requiring more workers, materials, and space to build. 

Another issue we’ll have to tackle soon is energy storage. Wind and solar are variable energy producers, meaning the amount of electricity they produce relies on several factors. On perfect days, harnessing all the excess energy produced and effectively storing it can go a long way toward a clean energy grid. 

Recently, researchers in Finland have created a device that allows low-grade sand to store heat energy for months. The heat energy is used to warm homes and even a local swimming pool. The storage system isn’t as efficient when turning heat into electricity, but could potentially be improved to meet rising energy demand with low-cost solutions. 

Ensuring Workforce is Ready 

Amid a labor shortage, companies across many industries find it tough to attract enough workers to keep operations running smoothly. Electricians, in particular, are in high demand, making it even tougher to attract and retain talent. 

Sun-Pull Wire is one of many companies on the edge of innovation, developing products like bundled wire systems that can be installed quickly and save up to 80% of the installation time of string PV, helping with labor shortages and enabling DC installers to take on more projects. 

The Government Needs to Step Up 

If the U.S. wants to rely on renewable energy sources to power the country, support has to come from the top. 

The Biden administration took a big step forward by suspending solar tariffs for two years against four Asian countries, including Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Malaysia. In another encouraging step, the government recently lifted solar tariffs on goods coming in from Canada, a move made in 2018. 

Without the tariffs, utilities can import solar panels and other components at a lower price and reduce the number of delays and cancellations. Fewer tariffs also allow the installed solar capacity to continue growing at a healthier rate. 

Unfortunately, tariff concerns did have an impact on the market. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) reported in its Q2 2022 insights that about 18 GWdc worth of projects were put on hold for at least a year. Another 450 MW was outright canceled. 

Reduced tariffs aren’t all rainbows and butterflies, though. U.S. solar manufacturers may find it harder to compete against low-cost imports, claiming it as a disadvantage. On the other hand, utilities and other companies gain access to affordable panels, spurring the country toward its renewable energy goals. 

Ready to Learn More About Solar?  

Sun-Pull is ready to support a cleaner, renewable future with simple-to-use PV wire solutions. 

Our knowledgeable team of solar experts is ready to answer your questions and get the right products into your hand as fast as possible with the shortest lead times in the industry. The Sun-Pull team is ready to support you from start to finish, including blueprint analysis, product help, and decades of solar experience. 

Contact us today to see how we can get your utility-scale solar project off the ground quickly and cost-effectively.